Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Major and Persistent Depressive Disorders
202276 citationsHeather J. Walter, A. Reese Abright et al.Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of John Diamond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Diamond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Diamond more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Diamond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Diamond. The network helps show where John Diamond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Diamond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Diamond.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Diamond based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Diamond. John Diamond is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Walter, Heather J., A. Reese Abright, Oscar G. Bukstein, et al.. (2022). Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Major and Persistent Depressive Disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 62(5). 479–502.76 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Diamond, John, et al.. (2016). At Their Own Pace: Interim Findings from an Evaluation of a Computer-Assisted, Modular Approach to Developmental Math.. MDRC.8 indexed citations
4.
Grossman, Jean Baldwin, et al.. (2015). Changing Community Colleges: Early Lessons from Completion by Design.. MDRC.5 indexed citations
Diamond, John, et al.. (2014). Piecing Together the College Affordability Puzzle: Student Characteristics and Patterns of (Un)Affordability.. MDRC.4 indexed citations
7.
Weiss, Michael J., et al.. (2014). A Random Assignment Evaluation of Learning Communities Seven Years Later: Impacts on Education and Earnings Outcomes.. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.2 indexed citations
8.
Sommo, Colleen, et al.. (2014). Mapping Success: Performance-Based Scholarships, Student Services, and Developmental Math at Hillsborough Community College. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
Saeed, Sy Atezaz, R Bloch, & John Diamond. (2012). Telepsychiatry: Overcoming Barriers to Implementation: Providing Treatment Via Videoconferencing Can Improve Access to Care. Current psychiatry. 11(12). 28.3 indexed citations
Johnston, Lorraine & John Diamond. (2010). Innovation and knowledge exchange in regeneration management: the challenges and barriers of innovation practice?. Journal of urban regeneration and renewal. 4(1). 7–11.1 indexed citations
13.
Diamond, John & Joyce Liddle. (2005). Management of regeneration: choices, challenges and dilemmas. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository).10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.