John D. Jasper

1.3k total citations
44 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

John D. Jasper is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and General Decision Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, John D. Jasper has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 papers in Social Psychology and 8 papers in General Decision Sciences. Recurrent topics in John D. Jasper's work include Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (16 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers). John D. Jasper is often cited by papers focused on Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (16 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers). John D. Jasper collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sweden. John D. Jasper's co-authors include Irwin P. Levin, Stephen D. Christman, Anna Taddio, Gideon Koren, Adrienne Einarson, Thomas R. Einarson, Chandrima Bhattacharya, David A. Asch, Carol A. Nickerson and Jennifer R. Shapiro and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Personality and Individual Differences and Medical Care.

In The Last Decade

John D. Jasper

43 papers receiving 946 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John D. Jasper United States 19 310 207 184 174 153 44 1.0k
Rino Rumiati Italy 21 577 1.9× 227 1.1× 336 1.8× 244 1.4× 185 1.2× 71 1.5k
Barnabás Szászi Hungary 11 94 0.3× 65 0.3× 148 0.8× 142 0.8× 79 0.5× 22 747
Enrico Rubaltelli Italy 21 372 1.2× 34 0.2× 480 2.6× 218 1.3× 129 0.8× 67 1.5k
Aba Szollosi Hungary 12 148 0.5× 47 0.2× 94 0.5× 97 0.6× 163 1.1× 21 663
Catherine D. Rawn Canada 10 78 0.3× 45 0.2× 212 1.2× 329 1.9× 71 0.5× 14 802
Inge Brechan Norway 6 102 0.3× 54 0.3× 562 3.1× 174 1.0× 52 0.3× 10 1.1k
Aaron J. Moss United States 13 188 0.6× 37 0.2× 435 2.4× 258 1.5× 26 0.2× 19 1.1k
Paul C. Price United States 13 172 0.6× 18 0.1× 204 1.1× 145 0.8× 204 1.3× 43 819
Yael Benn United Kingdom 13 104 0.3× 87 0.4× 126 0.7× 161 0.9× 12 0.1× 28 792
Katherine S. Corker United States 11 115 0.4× 27 0.1× 207 1.1× 234 1.3× 23 0.2× 21 779

Countries citing papers authored by John D. Jasper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Jasper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Jasper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Jasper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Jasper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Jasper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Jasper. The network helps show where John D. Jasper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John D. Jasper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John D. Jasper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John D. Jasper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John D. Jasper. John D. Jasper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Reith, Mark, et al.. (2024). Personalized Learning Path Problem Variations: Computational Complexity and AI Approaches. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence. 6(3). 574–588.
3.
Jasper, John D., et al.. (2023). Increased levels of autistic traits are associated with atypical moral judgments. Acta Psychologica. 235. 103895–103895. 4 indexed citations
4.
Jasper, John D., et al.. (2022). Differences in moral judgment predict behavior in a Covid triage game scenario. Personality and Individual Differences. 195. 111671–111671. 2 indexed citations
5.
Jasper, John D., et al.. (2021). Individual differences in moral judgment predict attitudes towards mandatory vaccinations. Personality and Individual Differences. 186. 111391–111391. 15 indexed citations
6.
Bhattacharya, Chandrima & John D. Jasper. (2018). Degree of handedness: A unique individual differences factor for predicting and understanding hindsight bias. Personality and Individual Differences. 125. 97–101. 5 indexed citations
7.
Jasper, John D., et al.. (2014). Responding to framed health messages: Different strokes for different (handedness) folks. Psychology and Health. 29(6). 671–686. 14 indexed citations
8.
Jasper, John D., et al.. (2014). Handedness predicts motivation to switch from the status quo. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition. 19(6). 745–764. 3 indexed citations
9.
Jasper, John D., et al.. (2014). Individual differences in information order effects: The importance of right-hemisphere access in belief updating. Acta Psychologica. 148. 115–122. 9 indexed citations
10.
Jasper, John D., et al.. (2013). Enhanced activation of the left hemisphere promotes normative decision making. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition. 19(3). 368–382. 5 indexed citations
11.
Jasper, John D., et al.. (2008). Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice. Judgment and Decision Making. 3(5). 417–424. 4 indexed citations
12.
Christman, Stephen D., et al.. (2006). Individual differences in risk perception versus risk taking: Handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition. 63(1). 51–58. 49 indexed citations
13.
Koren, Gideon, et al.. (2005). Use of antidepressants by pregnant women: Evaluation of perception of risk, efficacy of evidence based counseling and determinants of decision making. Archives of Women s Mental Health. 8(4). 214–220. 127 indexed citations
14.
Jasper, John D. & Jennifer R. Shapiro. (2002). MouseTrace: A better mousetrap for catching decision processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 34(3). 364–374. 27 indexed citations
15.
Jasper, John D., Carol A. Nickerson, J C Hershey, & David A. Asch. (1999). The public’s attitudes toward incentives for organ donation. Transplantation Proceedings. 31(5). 2181–2184. 26 indexed citations
16.
Nickerson, Carol A., John D. Jasper, & David A. Asch. (1998). Comfort Level, Financial Incentives, and Consent for Organ Donation. Transplantation Proceedings. 30(1). 155–159. 6 indexed citations
17.
Levin, Irwin P., John D. Jasper, & Gary J. Gaeth. (1996). Measuring the Effects of Framing Country-Of-Origin Information: a Process Tracing Approach. ACR North American Advances. 13 indexed citations
18.
Levin, Irwin P. & John D. Jasper. (1995). Phased Narrowing: A New Process Tracing Method for Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 64(1). 1–8. 38 indexed citations
19.
Levin, Irwin P., John D. Jasper, John D. Mittelstaedt, & Gary J. Gaeth. (1993). Attitudes Toward QBuy America FirstQ and Preferences For American and Japanese Cars: a Different Role For Country-Of-Origin Information. ACR North American Advances. 26 indexed citations
20.
Levin, Irwin P. & John D. Jasper. (1993). Attitudes toward `buy America first' and preferences for American and Japanese cars: A different. Advances in consumer research. 20(1). 625–629. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026