Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Whiplash Shaken Infant Syndrome: Manual Shaking by the Extremities With Whiplash-Induced Intracranial and Intraocular Bleedings, Linked With Residual Permanent Brain Damage and Mental Retardation
This map shows the geographic impact of John Caffey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Caffey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Caffey more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Caffey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Caffey. The network helps show where John Caffey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Caffey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Caffey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Caffey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Caffey. John Caffey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Caffey, John, Frederic N. Silverman, & Jerald P. Kuhn. (1985). Caffey's Pediatric X-Ray Diagnosis: An Integrated Imaging Approach. Medical Entomology and Zoology.83 indexed citations
3.
Caffey, John. (1978). Pediatric x-ray diagnosis: Textbook for students and practitioners of pediatrics, surgery & radiology. Medical Entomology and Zoology.10 indexed citations
4.
Caffey, John. (1974). The Whiplash Shaken Infant Syndrome: Manual Shaking by the Extremities With Whiplash-Induced Intracranial and Intraocular Bleedings, Linked With Residual Permanent Brain Damage and Mental Retardation. PEDIATRICS. 54(4). 396–403.461 indexed citations breakdown →
Caffey, John, et al.. (1959). Acute atrophy of the thymus induced by adrenocorticosteroids: observed roentgenographically in living infants: a preliminary report.. PubMed. 82. 530–40.20 indexed citations
Caffey, John & S E Ross. (1958). Pelvic bones in infantile mongoloidism; roentgenographic features.. PubMed. 80(3). 458–67.29 indexed citations
14.
Caffey, John. (1958). Achondroplasia of pelvis and lumbosacral spine; some roentgenographic features.. PubMed. 80(3). 449–57.28 indexed citations
15.
Se, Ross & John Caffey. (1957). Ossification of the calcaneal apophysis in healthy children: some normal radiographic features.. PubMed. 15(3). 224–6.5 indexed citations
16.
Caffey, John. (1956). The first sixty years of pediatric roentgenology in the United States, 1896 to 1956.. PubMed. 76(3). 437–54.4 indexed citations
17.
Caffey, John. (1955). On fibrous defects in cortical walls of growing tubular bones: their radiologic appearance, structure, prevalence, natural course, and diagnostic significance.. PubMed. 7. 13–51.52 indexed citations
Caffey, John. (1951). Chronic poisoning due to excess of vitamin A; description of the clinical and roentgen manifestations in seven infants and young children.. PubMed. 65(1). 12–26.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.