John Buckerfield

405 total citations
9 papers, 295 citations indexed

About

John Buckerfield is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John Buckerfield has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 295 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 4 papers in Ecology and 4 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in John Buckerfield's work include Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology (6 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (3 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (2 papers). John Buckerfield is often cited by papers focused on Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology (6 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (3 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (2 papers). John Buckerfield collaborates with scholars based in Australia. John Buckerfield's co-authors include J.H.A. Butler, Geoff Baker, Β. M. Doube, C.W. Davoren, Kenneth E. Lee, Peter Grace, C. E. Pankhurst, V. V. S. R. Gupta, Stephen M. Neate and N. J. McKenzie and has published in prestigious journals such as Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Pedobiologia and Australian Journal of Ecology.

In The Last Decade

John Buckerfield

8 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Buckerfield Australia	8	188	177	89	53	48	9	295
Norton Pólo Benito Brazil	10	150 0.8×	135 0.8×	63 0.7×	80 1.5×	9 0.2×	21	334
Johnny Boyer France	7	108 0.6×	122 0.7×	63 0.7×	132 2.5×	12 0.3×	14	296
S.A. Viljoen South Africa	13	197 1.0×	240 1.4×	126 1.4×	30 0.6×	11 0.2×	17	492
R. M. C. Muchovej Brazil	10	54 0.3×	48 0.3×	26 0.3×	184 3.5×	30 0.6×	36	291
M. F. Treacy United States	12	90 0.5×	36 0.2×	49 0.6×	96 1.8×	85 1.8×	18	321
Priyasankar Chaudhuri India	12	160 0.9×	214 1.2×	54 0.6×	31 0.6×	5 0.1×	40	360
Fernando Antônio Macena da Silva Brazil	8	71 0.4×	161 0.9×	37 0.4×	130 2.5×	40 0.8×	19	358
David Minkey Australia	6	41 0.2×	192 1.1×	112 1.3×	176 3.3×	32 0.7×	11	334
Clément Bardon France	7	62 0.3×	165 0.9×	67 0.8×	232 4.4×	33 0.7×	8	391
Wilian Demetrio Brazil	8	99 0.5×	116 0.7×	53 0.6×	47 0.9×	10 0.2×	24	226

Countries citing papers authored by John Buckerfield

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Buckerfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Buckerfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Buckerfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Buckerfield

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Buckerfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Buckerfield. The network helps show where John Buckerfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Buckerfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Buckerfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Buckerfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Buckerfield. John Buckerfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Buckerfield, John, et al.. (1999). Vermicompost in solid and liquid forms as a plant-growth promoter. Pedobiologia. 43(6). 753–759. 23 indexed citations

2.

Buckerfield, John, et al.. (1997). Earthworms as indicators of sustainable production in dryland cropping in southern Australia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 29(3-4). 547–554. 39 indexed citations

3.

Buckerfield, John, et al.. (1997). Earthworm populations recover after potato cropping. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 29(3-4). 609–612. 9 indexed citations

4.

Baker, Geoff, John Buckerfield, C. E. Pankhurst, et al.. (1994). The introduction and management of earthworms to improve soil structure and fertility in south-eastern Australia.. 42–49. 21 indexed citations

5.

Rovira, Albert, David K. Roget, Stephen M. Neate, et al.. (1992). The effect of conservation tillage practices on soil properties, earthworms, cereal root diseases and wheat yields. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University). 1 indexed citations

6.

Buckerfield, John. (1992). Earthworm populations in dryland cropping soils under conservation-tillage in south australia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 24(12). 1667–1672. 29 indexed citations

7.

Baker, Geoff, et al.. (1992). The abundance and diversity of earthworms in pasture soils in the fleurieu peninsula, south australia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 24(12). 1389–1395. 58 indexed citations

8.

Baker, Geoff, et al.. (1992). The life history and abundance of the introduced earthwormsAporrectodea trapezoidesandA. caliginosa(Annelida: Lumbricidae) in pasture soils in the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology. 17(2). 177–188. 48 indexed citations

9.

Butler, J.H.A. & John Buckerfield. (1979). Digestion of lignin by termites. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 11(5). 507–513. 67 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact