John Bishop

5.0k total citations
141 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

John Bishop is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, John Bishop has authored 141 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 71 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 36 papers in Oceanography and 34 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in John Bishop's work include Marine Ecology and Invasive Species (64 papers), Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry (23 papers) and Marine Biology and Ecology Research (23 papers). John Bishop is often cited by papers focused on Marine Ecology and Invasive Species (64 papers), Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry (23 papers) and Marine Biology and Ecology Research (23 papers). John Bishop collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. John Bishop's co-authors include Frédérique Viard, David T. Bilton, Christine A. Wood, José Realino de Paula, Robert C. Lane, J. S. Ryland, Roger N. Hughes, Federica Pannacciulli, Patricio H. Manríquez and Lise Dupont and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

John Bishop

136 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Bishop United Kingdom 35 1.6k 1.2k 1.0k 586 564 141 3.3k
John Gage United Kingdom 40 2.0k 1.2× 2.3k 2.0× 3.4k 3.3× 126 0.2× 131 0.2× 151 5.1k
Allen G. Collins United States 41 2.6k 1.6× 2.9k 2.5× 1.2k 1.2× 1.0k 1.7× 1.7k 3.0× 136 6.7k
Rupert Ormond United Kingdom 31 1.3k 0.8× 2.8k 2.4× 787 0.8× 551 0.9× 188 0.3× 75 5.0k
Stephen J. Smith Canada 21 587 0.4× 838 0.7× 487 0.5× 293 0.5× 90 0.2× 83 2.1k
H. Jane Brockmann United States 30 579 0.4× 866 0.7× 138 0.1× 1.1k 1.9× 340 0.6× 71 3.5k
Jon Mallatt United States 28 385 0.2× 982 0.8× 370 0.4× 392 0.7× 896 1.6× 68 3.8k
T. J. Pitcher United Kingdom 36 2.1k 1.3× 2.0k 1.7× 390 0.4× 376 0.6× 170 0.3× 63 4.4k
Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen Denmark 38 863 0.5× 2.0k 1.7× 1.6k 1.6× 516 0.9× 1.4k 2.5× 155 5.7k
Geoffrey Fryer United Kingdom 44 936 0.6× 4.6k 4.0× 1.5k 1.4× 916 1.6× 452 0.8× 154 8.2k
Ralph Tollrian Germany 41 753 0.5× 2.8k 2.4× 852 0.8× 1.1k 1.9× 532 0.9× 107 5.7k

Countries citing papers authored by John Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bishop. The network helps show where John Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Bishop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Bishop. John Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bishop, John, et al.. (2025). Fusion, fission, and scrambling of the bilaterian genome in Bryozoa. Genome Research. 35(1). 78–92. 6 indexed citations
2.
Bishop, John, et al.. (2025). Varieties of Religious Naturalism: A Conceptual Investigation. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie. 67(2). 129–149. 2 indexed citations
3.
Bishop, John. (2025). Swinburne’s theodicy: ‘horrendous suffering has no rationale’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 98(3). 271–281.
4.
Kao, Linda, Mei‐Yeh Jade Lu, Kazuyoshi Endo, et al.. (2025). Phoronid genome supports a monophyletic Lophophorata. Current Biology. 35(22). 5633–5645.e7.
5.
Sato, Atsuko, et al.. (2022). Co-expression network analysis of environmental canalization in the ascidian Ciona. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 22(1). 53–53. 1 indexed citations
6.
Wood, Christine A., et al.. (2017). Distribution of the invasive bryozoan Schizoporella japonica in Great Britain and Ireland and a review of its European distribution. Biological Invasions. 19(8). 2225–2235. 17 indexed citations
7.
Bouchemousse, Sarah, John Bishop, & Frédérique Viard. (2016). Contrasting global genetic patterns in two biologically similar, widespread and invasive Ciona species (Tunicata, Ascidiacea). Scientific Reports. 6(1). 24875–24875. 67 indexed citations
8.
Nishikawa, Teruaki, Ichiro Oohara, Kenji Saitoh, et al.. (2014). Molecular and Morphological Discrimination Between an Invasive Ascidian,Ascidiella aspersa, and Its CongenerA. scabra(Urochordata: Ascidiacea). ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE. 31(3). 180–185. 23 indexed citations
9.
Sato, Atsuko, Sebastian M. Shimeld, & John Bishop. (2014). Symmetrical Reproductive Compatibility of Two Species in the Ciona intestinalis (Ascidiacea) Species Complex, a Model for Marine Genomics and Developmental Biology. ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE. 31(6). 369–369. 28 indexed citations
10.
Bishop, John, Anna L. E. Yunnie, Christine A. Wood, et al.. (2012). The Southern Hemisphere ascidian Asterocarpa humilis is unrecognised but widely established in NW France and Great Britain. Biological Invasions. 15(2). 253–260. 27 indexed citations
11.
Goldstien, Sharyn J., Lise Dupont, Frédérique Viard, et al.. (2011). Global Phylogeography of the Widely Introduced North West Pacific Ascidian Styela clava. PLoS ONE. 6(2). e16755–e16755. 58 indexed citations
12.
Johnston, Emma L., et al.. (2011). Bearing the burden of boat harbours: Heavy contaminant and fouling loads in a native habitat-forming alga. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 62(10). 2137–2144. 33 indexed citations
13.
Sköld, Helén Nilsson, et al.. (2011). Pattern of Cell Proliferation During Budding in the Colonial Ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. Biological Bulletin. 221(1). 126–136. 7 indexed citations
15.
Sato, Atsuko, John Bishop, & Peter W. H. Holland. (2008). Developmental biology of pterobranch hemichordates: History and perspectives. genesis. 46(11). 587–591. 29 indexed citations
16.
Dixon, David R., et al.. (2006). Lunar-related reproductive behaviour in the badger (Meles meles). acta ethologica. 9(2). 28 indexed citations
17.
Hughes, Roger N., Patricio H. Manríquez, Simon A. Morley, Sean F. Craig, & John Bishop. (2004). Kin or self‐recognition? Colonial fusibility of the bryozoan Celleporella hyalina. Evolution & Development. 6(6). 431–437. 38 indexed citations
18.
Bishop, John, et al.. (1996). Autoradiographic investigation of uptake and storage of exogenous sperm by the ovary of the compound ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. Marine Biology. 125(4). 663–670. 18 indexed citations
19.
Ryland, J. S. & John Bishop. (1993). Internal fertilisation in hermaphroditic colonial invertebrates. 31. 445–477. 31 indexed citations
20.
Bishop, John. (1981). A revised definition of the genus Epileucon Jones (Crustacea, Cumacea) with descriptions of species from the deep Atlantic. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 291(1052). 353–409. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026