Johanna Spiers

739 total citations
29 papers, 386 citations indexed

About

Johanna Spiers is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Johanna Spiers has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 386 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Clinical Psychology and 8 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Johanna Spiers's work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (10 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers). Johanna Spiers is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (10 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers). Johanna Spiers collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and Romania. Johanna Spiers's co-authors include Ruth Riley, Jonathan A. Smith, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, Marta Buszewicz, Anna Taylor, Adam R. Nicholls, Martin Drage, Maria van Hove, Anya Göpfert and Rob Horne and has published in prestigious journals such as Health Psychology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Johanna Spiers

27 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Johanna Spiers United Kingdom 13 175 94 93 67 49 29 386
Carles Martín-Fumadó Spain 13 178 1.0× 131 1.4× 188 2.0× 57 0.9× 63 1.3× 105 551
Erin Cameron Canada 12 120 0.7× 105 1.1× 93 1.0× 30 0.4× 46 0.9× 70 461
Patrick O’Donnell Ireland 10 204 1.2× 97 1.0× 70 0.8× 32 0.5× 66 1.3× 44 430
Pamela Grassau Canada 13 187 1.1× 156 1.7× 103 1.1× 105 1.6× 100 2.0× 31 473
Wei‐Chen Tung United States 14 189 1.1× 66 0.7× 104 1.1× 57 0.9× 86 1.8× 62 576
Hanna Amanuel United States 5 103 0.6× 64 0.7× 183 2.0× 61 0.9× 70 1.4× 10 399
Priscilla D. Abercrombie United States 13 148 0.8× 99 1.1× 159 1.7× 44 0.7× 104 2.1× 24 558
Eduardo Medina Peru 9 154 0.9× 79 0.8× 110 1.2× 39 0.6× 148 3.0× 36 509
Olga Canet Vélez Spain 11 165 0.9× 162 1.7× 115 1.2× 41 0.6× 49 1.0× 38 625
Ayten Şentürk Erenel Türkiye 12 98 0.6× 69 0.7× 63 0.7× 40 0.6× 48 1.0× 53 311

Countries citing papers authored by Johanna Spiers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johanna Spiers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johanna Spiers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johanna Spiers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johanna Spiers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johanna Spiers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johanna Spiers. The network helps show where Johanna Spiers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johanna Spiers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johanna Spiers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johanna Spiers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Johanna Spiers. Johanna Spiers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Abrams, Ruth, et al.. (2024). Implementing and sustaining dementia care coordinators across integrated care systems: a realist evaluation. BMC Medicine. 22(1). 584–584. 2 indexed citations
2.
Spiers, Johanna, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, Nikolaos Efstathiou, et al.. (2024). Filling in the gaps: A grounded theory of the experiences and needs of healthcare staff following a colleague death by suicide in the UK. Death Studies. 49(4). 448–459. 1 indexed citations
3.
Spiers, Johanna, et al.. (2024). A Method for Synthesizing Qualitative Data Sources in the Co-Production of Postvention Guidelines for the NHS: A Worked Example. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 23.
4.
5.
Dunning, Alice, Kevin Teoh, James Martín, et al.. (2022). Relationship between working conditions and psychological distress experienced by junior doctors in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey study. BMJ Open. 12(8). e061331–e061331. 12 indexed citations
6.
Spiers, Johanna, Marta Buszewicz, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, et al.. (2022). Recommendations for improving the working conditions and cultures of distressed junior doctors, based on a qualitative study and stakeholder perspectives. BMC Health Services Research. 22(1). 1333–1333. 4 indexed citations
7.
Spiers, Johanna, Nikolaos Efstathiou, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, et al.. (2022). The Impact of Colleague Suicide and the Current State of Postvention Guidance for Affected Co-Workers: A Critical Integrative Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(18). 11565–11565. 12 indexed citations
8.
Spiers, Johanna, Marta Buszewicz, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, et al.. (2021). What challenges did junior doctors face while working during the COVID-19 pandemic? A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 11(12). e056122–e056122. 25 indexed citations
9.
10.
Spiers, Johanna, Jonathan A. Smith, Jane Anderson, et al.. (2019). A Qualitative Study to Identify Perceptual Barriers to Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Uptake and Adherence in HIV Positive People from UK Black African and Caribbean Communities. AIDS and Behavior. 23(9). 2514–2521. 20 indexed citations
11.
12.
Riley, Ruth, et al.. (2018). What are the sources of stress and distress for general practitioners working in England? A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 8(1). e017361–e017361. 48 indexed citations
13.
Spiers, Johanna, et al.. (2017). Evaluation of an online educational tool designed to reduce stress and boost well-being for people living with an ileostomy : a framework analysis. Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull). 7(1). 10–18. 1 indexed citations
14.
Spiers, Johanna, Marta Buszewicz, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, et al.. (2017). Barriers, facilitators, and survival strategies for GPs seeking treatment for distress: a qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice. 67(663). e700–e708. 51 indexed citations
15.
16.
Nicholls, Adam R., et al.. (2016). An online educational tool to promote psychological well-being, optimism, and coping self-efficacy among people living with an ileostomy : a pilot study. Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull). 6(5). 156–161. 1 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Jonathan A., et al.. (2016). The psychological challenges of living with an ileostomy: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.. Health Psychology. 36(2). 143–151. 43 indexed citations
18.
Spiers, Johanna & Jonathan A. Smith. (2016). Rebirth and change during a living donor kidney transplant: An interpretative phenomenological analysis case study. 1(21). 14–17. 1 indexed citations
19.
Spiers, Johanna & Jonathan A. Smith. (2015). Waiting for a kidney from a deceased donor: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology Health & Medicine. 21(7). 836–844. 14 indexed citations
20.
Spiers, Johanna, et al.. (2013). What are the barriers to antiretroviral adherence in people from UK Black African and Black Caribbean communities? A qualitative study. UCL Discovery (University College London).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carles Martín-Fumadó Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Erin Cameron Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patrick O’Donnell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pamela Grassau Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wei‐Chen Tung Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hanna Amanuel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Priscilla D. Abercrombie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eduardo Medina Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Olga Canet Vélez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ayten Şentürk Erenel
Rankless by CCL
2026