Johan Stendahl

4.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
60 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Johan Stendahl is a scholar working on Ecology, Soil Science and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Johan Stendahl has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Ecology, 22 papers in Soil Science and 22 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Johan Stendahl's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (22 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (21 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (20 papers). Johan Stendahl is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (22 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (21 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (20 papers). Johan Stendahl collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Finland and United Kingdom. Johan Stendahl's co-authors include Jan Seibert, Rasmus Sørensen, Mats Fröberg, Tord Snäll, Henrik Andrén, María C. Ruiz-Jaén, Robert Bagchi, Christopher D. Philipson, Erik Andersson and Jon Moen and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Cleaner Production and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Johan Stendahl

57 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Johan Stendahl Sweden 24 1.3k 1.0k 859 804 537 60 3.1k
Karsten Raulund‐Rasmussen Denmark 36 989 0.7× 1.0k 1.0× 1.3k 1.5× 940 1.2× 437 0.8× 81 3.5k
Tomas Lundmark Sweden 32 1.9k 1.4× 1.1k 1.1× 536 0.6× 541 0.7× 453 0.8× 90 3.0k
Agustı́n Merino Spain 35 1.3k 1.0× 850 0.8× 1.4k 1.6× 740 0.9× 247 0.5× 113 3.3k
L. E. Nave United States 23 1.2k 0.9× 760 0.7× 1.0k 1.2× 796 1.0× 274 0.5× 56 2.3k
Robert Jandl Austria 31 1.9k 1.4× 1.2k 1.2× 2.2k 2.6× 1.4k 1.7× 468 0.9× 95 4.3k
Elena Vanguelova United Kingdom 23 899 0.7× 872 0.9× 1.3k 1.5× 704 0.9× 307 0.6× 59 2.9k
Eric J. Jokela United States 34 1.8k 1.4× 2.4k 2.4× 750 0.9× 533 0.7× 347 0.6× 97 3.7k
Kenneth A. Byrne Ireland 26 1.3k 1.0× 693 0.7× 1.3k 1.5× 1.3k 1.7× 210 0.4× 80 3.2k
Jagtar S. Bhatti Canada 31 1.5k 1.1× 687 0.7× 723 0.8× 1.0k 1.2× 153 0.3× 77 2.8k
Aleksi Lehtonen Finland 34 2.0k 1.5× 1.8k 1.8× 456 0.5× 660 0.8× 337 0.6× 113 3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Stendahl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Stendahl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Stendahl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Stendahl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Stendahl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Stendahl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Stendahl. The network helps show where Johan Stendahl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johan Stendahl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johan Stendahl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johan Stendahl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Johan Stendahl. Johan Stendahl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pérez‐Izquierdo, Leticia, Karina E. Clemmensen, Anders Dahlberg, et al.. (2025). Ectomycorrhizal decomposers and their niche(s) in boreal forests. Functional Ecology. 39(8). 1998–2014.
2.
Gustafsson, Jon Petter, et al.. (2025). Determining Exchangeable Base Cations in Forest Soils: A Comparison of Three Methods. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 188(5). 847–858.
3.
Spohn, Marie & Johan Stendahl. (2023). Spatial patterns of nitrogen isotope ratios in forest soils are related to latitude and soil phosphorus concentration. Biogeochemistry. 165(1). 43–56. 3 indexed citations
4.
Jonsson, Ragnar, et al.. (2023). Demand-driven climate change mitigation and trade-offs from wood product substitution: The case of Swedish multi-family housing construction. Journal of Cleaner Production. 421. 138487–138487. 10 indexed citations
5.
Ågren, Anneli, Eliza Maher Hasselquist, Johan Stendahl, Mats B. Nilsson, & Siddhartho Shekhar Paul. (2022). Delineating the distribution of mineral and peat soils at the landscape scale in northern boreal regions. SOIL. 8(2). 733–749. 15 indexed citations
6.
Petersson, Hans, David Ellison, Göran Berndes, et al.. (2022). On the role of forests and the forest sector for climate change mitigation in Sweden. GCB Bioenergy. 14(7). 793–813. 44 indexed citations
8.
Lindahl, Björn D., Julia Kyaschenko, Karina E. Clemmensen, et al.. (2021). A group of ectomycorrhizal fungi restricts organic matter accumulation in boreal forest. Ecology Letters. 24(7). 1341–1351. 118 indexed citations
9.
Hounkpatin, Ozias, Johan Stendahl, Mattias Lundblad, & Erik Karltun. (2021). Predicting the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stock in Swedish forests using a group of covariates and site-specific data. SOIL. 7(2). 377–398. 16 indexed citations
11.
Grip, Harald, Stephen Hillier, Sune Linder, et al.. (2020). Current, steady-state and historical weathering rates of base cations at two forest sites in northern and southern Sweden: a comparison of three methods. Biogeosciences. 17(2). 281–304. 11 indexed citations
12.
Hounkpatin, Ozias, Johan Stendahl, Mattias Lundblad, & Erik Karltun. (2020). Predicting the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stockin Swedish forests using remotely sensed and site-specificvariables. 1 indexed citations
13.
Akselsson, Cecilia, Salim Belyazid, Johan Stendahl, et al.. (2019). Weathering rates in Swedish forest soils. Biogeosciences. 16(22). 4429–4450. 14 indexed citations
14.
Rosenstock, Nicholas P., Johan Stendahl, Grégory van der Heijden, et al.. (2019). Base cations in the soil bank: non-exchangeable pools may sustain centuries of net loss to forestry and leaching. SOIL. 5(2). 351–366. 20 indexed citations
15.
Ranius, Thomas, Aino Hämäläinen, Gustaf Egnell, et al.. (2018). The effects of logging residue extraction for energy on ecosystem services and biodiversity: A synthesis. Journal of Environmental Management. 209. 409–425. 116 indexed citations
16.
17.
Stendahl, Johan, Björn Berg, & Björn D. Lindahl. (2017). Manganese availability is negatively associated with carbon storage in northern coniferous forest humus layers. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 15487–15487. 49 indexed citations
18.
Ťupek, Boris, Carina A. Ortiz, Shoji Hashimoto, et al.. (2016). Underestimation of boreal soil carbon stocks by mathematical soil carbon models linked to soil nutrient status. Biogeosciences. 13(15). 4439–4459. 19 indexed citations
19.
Ortiz, Carina A., Jari Liski, Annemieke I. Gärdenäs, et al.. (2013). Soil organic carbon stock changes in Swedish forest soils—A comparison of uncertainties and their sources through a national inventory and two simulation models. Ecological Modelling. 251. 221–231. 55 indexed citations
20.
Gamfeldt, Lars, Tord Snäll, Robert Bagchi, et al.. (2013). Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nature Communications. 4(1). 1340–1340. 1060 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026