Jody Rodgers

749 total citations
14 papers, 655 citations indexed

About

Jody Rodgers is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Biomaterials and Process Chemistry and Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jody Rodgers has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 655 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Organic Chemistry, 8 papers in Biomaterials and 7 papers in Process Chemistry and Technology. Recurrent topics in Jody Rodgers's work include Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (7 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (7 papers) and Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (6 papers). Jody Rodgers is often cited by papers focused on Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (7 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (7 papers) and Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (6 papers). Jody Rodgers collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and China. Jody Rodgers's co-authors include Donald J. Darensbourg, R.M. Mackiewicz, Andrea L. Phelps, D.R. Billodeaux, Joseph H. Reibenspies, J.C. Yarbrough, Milad Abolhasani, M. Janka, Xiaowu Wang and Joost N. H. Reek and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Communications and ACS Catalysis.

In The Last Decade

Jody Rodgers

14 papers receiving 645 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jody Rodgers United States	12	478	319	282	202	136	14	655
Andrea L. Phelps United States	11	665 1.4×	431 1.4×	361 1.3×	283 1.4×	194 1.4×	14	854
Felipe de la Cruz‐Martínez Spain	16	488 1.0×	206 0.6×	291 1.0×	173 0.9×	170 1.3×	39	707
Markus Allmendinger Germany	11	529 1.1×	348 1.1×	398 1.4×	133 0.7×	133 1.0×	12	679
Andreas Phanopoulos United Kingdom	13	361 0.8×	200 0.6×	346 1.2×	107 0.5×	202 1.5×	28	651
Fernando Castro‐Gómez Spain	6	585 1.2×	198 0.6×	152 0.5×	304 1.5×	214 1.6×	8	636
Robert Eberhardt Germany	10	754 1.6×	435 1.4×	578 2.0×	218 1.1×	161 1.2×	11	949
Adriana I. Moncada United States	9	421 0.9×	269 0.8×	337 1.2×	153 0.8×	92 0.7×	10	622
Gemma Trott United Kingdom	5	466 1.0×	381 1.2×	279 1.0×	126 0.6×	90 0.7×	5	594
Sung Jae Na South Korea	14	916 1.9×	606 1.9×	568 2.0×	318 1.6×	177 1.3×	14	1.2k
Kori A. Andrea Canada	11	274 0.6×	113 0.4×	180 0.6×	123 0.6×	113 0.8×	13	419

Countries citing papers authored by Jody Rodgers

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jody Rodgers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jody Rodgers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jody Rodgers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jody Rodgers

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jody Rodgers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jody Rodgers. The network helps show where Jody Rodgers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jody Rodgers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jody Rodgers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jody Rodgers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jody Rodgers. Jody Rodgers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

Bennett, Jeffrey A., et al.. (2022). Flexible homogeneous hydroformylation: on-demand tuning of aldehyde branching with a cyclic fluorophosphite ligand. Journal of Catalysis. 409. 105–117. 16 indexed citations

Fuentes, José A., M. Janka, Jody Rodgers, et al.. (2021). Effect of Ligand Backbone on the Selectivity and Stability of Rhodium Hydroformylation Catalysts Derived from Phospholane-Phosphites. Organometallics. 40(23). 3966–3978. 19 indexed citations

Raghuvanshi, Keshav, Cheng Zhu, Mahdi Ramezani, et al.. (2020). Highly Efficient 1-Octene Hydroformylation at Low Syngas Pressure: From Single-Droplet Screening to Continuous Flow Synthesis. ACS Catalysis. 10(14). 7535–7542. 26 indexed citations

Zhu, Cheng, Keshav Raghuvanshi, Connor W. Coley, et al.. (2018). Flow chemistry-enabled studies of rhodium-catalyzed hydroformylation reactions. Chemical Communications. 54(62). 8567–8570. 34 indexed citations

Wang, Xiaowu, Sandra S. Nurttila, Wojciech I. Dzik, et al.. (2017). Tuning the Porphyrin Building Block in Self‐Assembled Cages for Branched‐Selective Hydroformylation of Propene. Chemistry - A European Journal. 23(59). 14769–14777. 50 indexed citations

Wang, Xiaowu, Sandra S. Nurttila, Wojciech I. Dzik, et al.. (2017). Cover Feature: Tuning the Porphyrin Building Block in Self‐Assembled Cages for Branched‐Selective Hydroformylation of Propene (Chem. Eur. J. 59/2017). Chemistry - A European Journal. 23(59). 14666–14666. 1 indexed citations

Rodgers, Jody, Jerome W. Rathke, R. J. Klingler, & Christopher L. Marshall. (2007). Hydrolysis of silicon–hydride bonds catalyzed by ferromagnetic cobalt nanoparticles. Catalysis Letters. 114(3-4). 145–150. 5 indexed citations

Darensbourg, Donald J., et al.. (2005). Role of the Cocatalyst in the Copolymerization of CO₂ and Cyclohexene Oxide Utilizing Chromium Salen Complexes [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14026−14038].. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 127(49). 17565–17565. 13 indexed citations

Darensbourg, Donald J., Jody Rodgers, R.M. Mackiewicz, & Andrea L. Phelps. (2004). Probing the mechanistic aspects of the chromium salen catalyzed carbon dioxide/epoxide copolymerization process using in situ ATR/FTIR. Catalysis Today. 98(4). 485–492. 45 indexed citations

10.

Darensbourg, Donald J., R.M. Mackiewicz, Jody Rodgers, & Andrea L. Phelps. (2004). (Salen)Cr^IIIX Catalysts for the Copolymerization of Carbon Dioxide and Epoxides: Role of the Initiator and Cocatalyst. Inorganic Chemistry. 43(6). 1831–1833. 102 indexed citations

11.

Darensbourg, Donald J., et al.. (2004). Cyclohexene Oxide/CO₂ Copolymerization Catalyzed by Chromium(III) Salen Complexes and N-Methylimidazole: Effects of Varying Salen Ligand Substituents and Relative Cocatalyst Loading. Inorganic Chemistry. 43(19). 6024–6034. 159 indexed citations

12.

Darensbourg, Donald J., et al.. (2004). Catalytic Coupling of Carbon Dioxide and 2,3-Epoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene in the Presence of a (Salen)Cr^IIICl Derivative. Organometallics. 23(4). 924–927. 46 indexed citations

13.

Darensbourg, Donald J., et al.. (2003). The Copolymerization of Carbon Dioxide and [2-(3,4-Epoxycyclohexyl)ethyl]trimethoxysilane Catalyzed by (Salen)CrCl. Formation of a CO₂ Soluble Polycarbonate. Inorganic Chemistry. 42(15). 4498–4500. 36 indexed citations

14.

Darensbourg, Donald J., et al.. (2002). Carbon Dioxide/Epoxide Coupling Reactions Utilizing Lewis Base Adducts of Zinc Halides as Catalysts. Cyclic Carbonate versus Polycarbonate Production. Inorganic Chemistry. 42(2). 581–589. 103 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact