Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima
19981.6k citationsOle Sigmund, Joakim PeterssonStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimizationprofile →
Topology optimization of fluids in Stokes flow
2002824 citationsThomas Borrvall, Joakim PeterssonInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluidsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Joakim Petersson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Joakim Petersson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joakim Petersson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joakim Petersson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joakim Petersson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joakim Petersson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joakim Petersson. The network helps show where Joakim Petersson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joakim Petersson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joakim Petersson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joakim Petersson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joakim Petersson. Joakim Petersson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Strand, Susanne, et al.. (2016). Polisens arbete med riskbedömning och riskhantering för partnervåldsrelaterad brottslighet : Implementering och utvärdering av införandet av strukturerade riskbedömningar för partnervåldsrelaterad brottslighet som en arbetsmetod vid polismyndigheterna i Västernorrland och Jämtland under perioden 2011-2014.2 indexed citations
2.
Petersson, Joakim, et al.. (2007). Almost Isotropic Perimeters in Topology Optimization: Theoretical and Numerical Aspects. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
Borrvall, Thomas & Joakim Petersson. (2002). Topology optimization of fluids in Stokes flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 41(1). 77–107.824 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Petersson, Joakim & Bo Torstenfelt. (2002). Topology Optimization in Fluid Mechanics.12 indexed citations
Sigmund, Ole & Joakim Petersson. (1998). Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 16(1). 68–75.1626 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Petersson, Joakim & Ole Sigmund. (1998). Slope constrained topology optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 41(8). 1417–1434.270 indexed citations
Patriksson, Michael & Joakim Petersson. (1995). A Subgradient Method For Contact Structural Optimization. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.