Jo Mitchell

2.7k citations
44 papers · 1.8k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 16

Jo Mitchell

42 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from...5492003202620102018100200300400500

Peers

Jo Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Applied Psychology 256
  • Physiology 598
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 669
  • General Health Professions 336
  • Pharmacy 62
Replace Lynne Johnston with:
Lynne Johnston United Kingdom
Janet R. Wojcik United States
Samantha Adams Netherlands
Adam R. Hafdahl United States
Liza S. Rovniak United States
Wing Chung Lau Hong Kong
Hannah Arem United States
Steve Amireault Canada
Karim Abu‐Omar Germany
Youfa Wang United States
Jo Mitchell relative to Lynne Johnston United Kingdom Lynne Johnston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lynne Johnston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Mitchell. The network helps show where Jo Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Jo Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20238
2 20231
3 20222
4 202212
5 20211
6 202013
7 202020
8 20205
9 201917
10 201910
11 201838
12
Using applied games to engage mHealth users: A case study of MindMax
20180
13 201813
14 201720
15 201714
16 20156
17 200418
18
Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) studybreakdown →
2003549
19 200215
20 200172

About Jo Mitchell

Jo Mitchell is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Pharmacy and General Health Professions, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (12 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (9 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (8 papers), Community Health and Development (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (256 citations), Physiology (598 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (669 citations). Jo Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas J. Wareham, Kirsten L. Rennie, Rupert W. Jakes, Nicholas Day, Albertine J. Schuit, Susie J. Hennings, Stephen Sutton, David French, Simon J. Griffin and Wendy Hardeman. Their work appears in journals such as Public Health Research & Practice, BMC Public Health, Implementation Science, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health and Health Promotion Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026