Jo Foord

614 total citations
13 papers, 397 citations indexed

About

Jo Foord is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Jo Foord has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 397 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Urban Studies, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Jo Foord's work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (2 papers). Jo Foord is often cited by papers focused on Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (2 papers). Jo Foord collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Jo Foord's co-authors include Nicky Gregson, Graeme Evans, Sophie Bowlby, Allan M. Williams, Janet Henshall Momsen and Laura McDowell and has published in prestigious journals such as Cities, Antipode and International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management.

In The Last Decade

Jo Foord

13 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jo Foord United Kingdom 8 199 135 83 41 36 13 397
Dariusz Świa̧tek Poland 7 139 0.7× 139 1.0× 83 1.0× 166 4.0× 40 1.1× 13 448
Elizabeth Currid United States 10 441 2.2× 213 1.6× 219 2.6× 42 1.0× 43 1.2× 12 574
Rick Ball United Kingdom 10 66 0.3× 167 1.2× 83 1.0× 26 0.6× 65 1.8× 22 476
Alena Rochovská Slovakia 6 170 0.9× 145 1.1× 62 0.7× 139 3.4× 7 0.2× 14 452
Eduardo Brito‐Henriques Portugal 8 338 1.7× 185 1.4× 99 1.2× 35 0.9× 13 0.4× 28 490
Brian Doucet Netherlands 13 346 1.7× 222 1.6× 48 0.6× 42 1.0× 78 2.2× 34 523
Seymour J. Mandelbaum United States 13 113 0.6× 129 1.0× 42 0.5× 101 2.5× 20 0.6× 44 417
Susanna Heldt Cassel Sweden 14 47 0.2× 286 2.1× 33 0.4× 13 0.3× 62 1.7× 29 450
Eliot Tretter United States 10 124 0.6× 128 0.9× 24 0.3× 39 1.0× 27 0.8× 20 308
Mathieu Van Criekingen Belgium 13 385 1.9× 367 2.7× 110 1.3× 89 2.2× 105 2.9× 77 764

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Foord

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Foord's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Foord with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Foord more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Foord

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Foord. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Foord. The network helps show where Jo Foord may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo Foord

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo Foord. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo Foord based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jo Foord. Jo Foord is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Foord, Jo. (2012). The new boomtown? Creative city to Tech City in east London. Cities. 33. 51–60. 51 indexed citations
2.
Williams, Allan M., et al.. (2012). Human mobility in functional urban regions: understanding the diversity of mobilities. International Review of Sociology. 22(2). 191–209. 10 indexed citations
3.
Foord, Jo. (2010). Mixed-Use Trade-Offs: How to Live and Work in a Compact City Neighbourhood. Built Environment. 36(1). 47–62. 41 indexed citations
4.
Foord, Jo. (2009). Strategies for creative industries: an international review. Creative Industries Journal. 1(2). 91–113. 107 indexed citations
5.
Evans, Graeme & Jo Foord. (2008). Cultural mapping and sustainable communities: planning for the arts revisited. Cultural Trends. 17(2). 65–96. 63 indexed citations
6.
Evans, Graeme & Jo Foord. (2004). Rich Mix Cities From Multicultural Experience to Cosmopolitan Engagement. Ethnologia Europaea. 34(2). 2 indexed citations
7.
Evans, Graeme & Jo Foord. (1999). European funding of culture: Promoting common culture or regional growth?. Cultural Trends. 9(36). 53–87. 15 indexed citations
8.
Bowlby, Sophie & Jo Foord. (1995). Relational contracting between UK retailers and manufactures. The International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research. 5(3). 333–360. 10 indexed citations
9.
Bowlby, Sophie, et al.. (1992). Changing consumption patterns: impacts on retailers and their suppliers. The International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research. 2(2). 133–150. 7 indexed citations
10.
Foord, Jo, et al.. (1992). CHANGING RELATIONS IN THE RETAIL‐SUPPLY CHAIN: GEOGRAPHICALAND EMPLOYMENT IMPLICATIONS. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 20(5). 6 indexed citations
11.
Gregson, Nicky & Jo Foord. (1987). PATRIARCHY: COMMENTS ON CRITICS. Antipode. 19(3). 371–375. 6 indexed citations
12.
Foord, Jo & Nicky Gregson. (1986). PATRIARCHY: TOWARDS A RECONCEPTUALISATION*:. Antipode. 18(2). 186–211. 76 indexed citations
13.
Bowlby, Sophie, Jo Foord, Laura McDowell, & Janet Henshall Momsen. (1982). Environment, planning and feminist theory: a British perspective. 14(6). 711–716. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026