J.M. Ingram

968 citations
55 papers · 739 indexed · h-index 13

J.M. Ingram

54 papers receiving 707 citations

Peers

J.M. Ingram
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 228
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 265
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 160
  • Aerospace Engineering 383
  • General Materials Science 32
Replace Seok Cho with:
Seok Cho South Korea
Phani K. Raj United States
Marina Silvestrini Italy
Luís Adriano Freitas Oliveira Portugal
Zhen Wei China
Martin Larcher Italy
Sagnik Mazumdar United States
Richard Clayton United States
J.M. Villafruela Spain
Christopher G. Ball Canada
J.M. Ingram relative to Seok Cho South Korea Seok Cho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.9×
Seok Cho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.M. Ingram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.M. Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M. Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M. Ingram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.M. Ingram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M. Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M. Ingram. The network helps show where J.M. Ingram may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 22 scholars most cited alongside J.M. Ingram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.M. Ingram Line = papers co-authored together J.M. Ingram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20227
2 20207
3 201910
4 20187
5 20172
6 20162
7 20152
8 20153
9 20148
10 20145
11 20136
12 201323
13 20131
14 201232
15 20012
16
Grief: A complex, unique and rich experience
20001
17 19996
18 19781
19 19759
20 195211

About J.M. Ingram

J.M. Ingram is a scholar working on General Materials Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 55 papers that have together received 739 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and Detonation Processes (23 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (16 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (13 papers), Engineering and Material Science Research (8 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (4 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (3 papers) and Energetic Materials and Combustion (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (228 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (265 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (160 citations), Aerospace Engineering (383 citations) and General Materials Science (32 citations). J.M. Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include P.G. Holborn, A.F. Averill, P.F. Nolan, Emil Novak, Jared Williams, Marian Lake, Andrew Rolt, Bayard Carter, Vishal Sethi and Papineni S. Rao. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Transactions of the IMF, Process Safety and Environmental Protection and Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026