J.-M. Hupe

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

J.-M. Hupe is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, J.-M. Hupe has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 1 paper in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in J.-M. Hupe's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper). J.-M. Hupe is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper). J.-M. Hupe collaborates with scholars based in France and United States. J.-M. Hupe's co-authors include J. Bullier, P. Girard, Stephen G. Lomber, Brennan R. Payne, Andrew C. James, C. Lamirel, Jean Lorenceau and Nava Rubin and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Neurophysiology and Journal of Vision.

In The Last Decade

J.-M. Hupe

6 papers receiving 985 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons

1998 648 citations J.-M. Hupe, Andrew C. James et al. Nature profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J.-M. Hupe France	4	948	261	81	74	69	6	1.0k
S. Chenchal Rao United States	7	1.4k 1.5×	308 1.2×	44 0.5×	93 1.3×	78 1.1×	8	1.5k
Sang‐Hun Lee South Korea	15	1.1k 1.1×	194 0.7×	73 0.9×	148 2.0×	101 1.5×	46	1.2k
James Gaska United States	11	729 0.8×	251 1.0×	63 0.8×	35 0.5×	100 1.4×	28	816
Jay Hegdé United States	15	790 0.8×	160 0.6×	174 2.1×	59 0.8×	58 0.8×	41	931
Arash Afraz United States	10	749 0.8×	195 0.7×	109 1.3×	107 1.4×	88 1.3×	21	851
Seiji Tanabe Japan	19	905 1.0×	276 1.1×	72 0.9×	22 0.3×	128 1.9×	43	1.0k
Hendrikje Nienborg United States	18	1.2k 1.2×	373 1.4×	55 0.7×	105 1.4×	94 1.4×	31	1.3k
Akiyuki Anzai United States	13	955 1.0×	312 1.2×	83 1.0×	29 0.4×	136 2.0×	16	1.0k
Madoka Moriya Japan	6	686 0.7×	130 0.5×	98 1.2×	65 0.9×	57 0.8×	7	756
Robert C. Emerson United States	15	844 0.9×	368 1.4×	94 1.2×	30 0.4×	118 1.7×	22	984

Countries citing papers authored by J.-M. Hupe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.-M. Hupe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.-M. Hupe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.-M. Hupe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.-M. Hupe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.-M. Hupe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.-M. Hupe. The network helps show where J.-M. Hupe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.-M. Hupe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.-M. Hupe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.-M. Hupe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.-M. Hupe. J.-M. Hupe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Hupe, J.-M.. (2010). Dynamics of enage a trois in moving plaid ambiguous perception. Journal of Vision. 10(7). 1217–1217. 4 indexed citations

2.

Hupe, J.-M. & Nava Rubin. (2010). Stimulus strength and dominance duration in perceptual bi-stability. Part II: from binocular rivalry to ambiguous motion displays. Journal of Vision. 2(7). 464–464. 1 indexed citations

3.

Lamirel, C., et al.. (2010). Pupil dynamics during bistable form/motion binding. Journal of Vision. 8(6). 253–253. 1 indexed citations

4.

Hupe, J.-M., C. Lamirel, & Jean Lorenceau. (2009). Pupil dynamics during bistable motion perception. Journal of Vision. 9(7). 10–10. 114 indexed citations

5.

Girard, P., J.-M. Hupe, & J. Bullier. (2001). Feedforward and Feedback Connections Between Areas V1 and V2 of the Monkey Have Similar Rapid Conduction Velocities. Journal of Neurophysiology. 85(3). 1328–1331. 240 indexed citations

6.

Hupe, J.-M., Andrew C. James, Brennan R. Payne, et al.. (1998). Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons. Nature. 394(6695). 784–787. 648 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact