Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy
19902.4k citationsRichard A. Henderson, J.M. Baldwin et al.Journal of Molecular Biologyprofile →
Electron-crystallographic Refinement of the Structure of Bacteriorhodopsin
1996810 citationsNikolaus Grigorieff, T.A. Ceska et al.Journal of Molecular Biologyprofile →
The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein-coupled receptors.
This map shows the geographic impact of J.M. Baldwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M. Baldwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M. Baldwin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M. Baldwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M. Baldwin. The network helps show where J.M. Baldwin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.M. Baldwin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.M. Baldwin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.M. Baldwin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J.M. Baldwin. J.M. Baldwin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Baldwin, J.M., Gebhard F. X. Schertler, & Vinzenz M. Unger. (1997). An alpha-carbon template for the transmembrane helices in the rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors 1 1Edited by R. Huber. Journal of Molecular Biology. 272(1). 144–164.580 indexed citations breakdown →
Grigorieff, Nikolaus, T.A. Ceska, Kenneth H. Downing, J.M. Baldwin, & Richard A. Henderson. (1996). Electron-crystallographic Refinement of the Structure of Bacteriorhodopsin. Journal of Molecular Biology. 259(3). 393–421.810 indexed citations breakdown →
Ceska, T.A., Richard A. Henderson, J.M. Baldwin, et al.. (1992). An atomic model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin, a seven-helix membrane protein.. PubMed. 607. 31–40.10 indexed citations
8.
Henderson, Richard A., J.M. Baldwin, T.A. Ceska, et al.. (1990). Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. Journal of Molecular Biology. 213(4). 899–929.2361 indexed citations breakdown →
Henderson, Richard A., J.M. Baldwin, Kenneth H. Downing, Jean Lepault, & F. Zemlin. (1986). Structure of purple membrane from halobacterium halobium: recording, measurement and evaluation of electron micrographs at 3.5 Å resolution. Ultramicroscopy. 19(2). 147–178.563 indexed citations breakdown →
Baldwin, J.M., et al.. (1984). Structure of bacteriorhodopsin. Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography. 40(a1). C21–C21.4 indexed citations
Baldwin, J.M. & Cyrus Chothia. (1979). Haemoglobin: The structural changes related to ligand binding and its allosteric mechanism. Journal of Molecular Biology. 129(2). 175–220.733 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.