Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change
20011.0k citationsM. S. Warren, Jane K. Hill et al.Natureprofile →
Comparative Losses of British Butterflies, Birds, and Plants and the Global Extinction Crisis
2004705 citationsJeremy A. Thomas, Mark G. Telfer et al.Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Asher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Asher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Asher more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Asher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Asher. The network helps show where Jim Asher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jim Asher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jim Asher.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jim Asher based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jim Asher. Jim Asher is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Fox, Richard, Tom Brereton, Jim Asher, et al.. (2011). The State of the UK's Butterflies 2011. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).7 indexed citations
Fox, Richard, M. S. Warren, Jim Asher, Tom Brereton, & David B. Roy. (2007). The state of Britain's butterflies 2007. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).8 indexed citations
5.
Fox, Robin Lane, Jim Asher, Tom Brereton, David B. Roy, & M. S. Warren. (2006). The state of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).82 indexed citations
Thomas, Jeremy A., Mark G. Telfer, David B. Roy, et al.. (2004). Comparative Losses of British Butterflies, Birds, and Plants and the Global Extinction Crisis. Science. 303(5665). 1879–1881.705 indexed citations breakdown →
Fox, Richard, et al.. (2003). Butterflies for the new millennium: mapping butterfly distributions in Britain (Lepidoptera). Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 79–86.1 indexed citations
Asher, Jim. (2001). The millennium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press eBooks.291 indexed citations
12.
Warren, M. S., Jane K. Hill, Jeremy A. Thomas, et al.. (2001). Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature. 414(6859). 65–69.1037 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Evans, Daniel D., T. W. Sammis, & Jim Asher. (1975). Plant Growth and Water Transfer Interactive Processes Under Desert Conditions. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.