Jill DeVito

442 total citations
8 papers, 354 citations indexed

About

Jill DeVito is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Jill DeVito has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 354 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 4 papers in Genetics and 4 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Jill DeVito's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). Jill DeVito is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). Jill DeVito collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Jill DeVito's co-authors include Adolfo Marco, Daniel R. Formanowicz, Douglas P. Chivers, Andrew R. Blaustein, Joseph M. Kiesecker, Michael T. Anderson, Ann L. Rypstra, Matthew H. Persons, Jesse M. Meik and Jason M. Schmidt and has published in prestigious journals such as Oikos, Canadian Journal of Zoology and Ethology.

In The Last Decade

Jill DeVito

8 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jill DeVito United States	7	247	144	118	103	84	8	354
Iain Matthews United Kingdom	5	284 1.1×	90 0.6×	118 1.0×	92 0.9×	85 1.0×	7	407
Gustavo S. Requena Brazil	11	273 1.1×	149 1.0×	81 0.7×	123 1.2×	85 1.0×	19	362
Sofia Caesar Sweden	8	344 1.4×	98 0.7×	81 0.7×	162 1.6×	83 1.0×	9	418
Katja Rohde Germany	8	169 0.7×	62 0.4×	79 0.7×	75 0.7×	83 1.0×	14	329
Chloe Adamopoulou Greece	11	263 1.1×	208 1.4×	114 1.0×	88 0.9×	35 0.4×	17	363
Steven R. Morey United States	5	275 1.1×	319 2.2×	131 1.1×	49 0.5×	91 1.1×	7	431
Richard N. C. Milner Australia	13	229 0.9×	74 0.5×	194 1.6×	82 0.8×	59 0.7×	21	367
Angela Chuang United States	7	127 0.5×	67 0.5×	134 1.1×	99 1.0×	73 0.9×	26	306
Marie‐Claire Chelini United States	10	177 0.7×	135 0.9×	99 0.8×	113 1.1×	68 0.8×	15	326
Arnaud Badiane France	12	183 0.7×	204 1.4×	105 0.9×	68 0.7×	71 0.8×	21	363

Countries citing papers authored by Jill DeVito

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jill DeVito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill DeVito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill DeVito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jill DeVito

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill DeVito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill DeVito. The network helps show where Jill DeVito may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill DeVito

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill DeVito. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill DeVito based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jill DeVito. Jill DeVito is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Rypstra, Ann L., et al.. (2007). Tradeoffs involved in site selection and foraging in a wolf spider: effects of substrate structure and predation risk. Oikos. 116(5). 853–863. 3 indexed citations

2.

Rypstra, Ann L., et al.. (2007). Tradeoffs involved in site selection and foraging in a wolf spider: effects of substrate structure and predation risk. Oikos. 116(5). 853–863. 54 indexed citations

3.

Wilder, Shawn M., Jill DeVito, Matthew H. Persons, & Ann L. Rypstra. (2005). THE EFFECTS OF MOISTURE AND HEAT ON THE EFFICACY OF CHEMICAL CUES USED IN PREDATOR DETECTION BY THE WOLF SPIDER PARDOSA MILVINA (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE). Journal of Arachnology. 33(3). 857–861. 28 indexed citations

4.

DeVito, Jill, et al.. (2004). Physiological tolerances of three sympatric riparian wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) correspond with microhabitat distributions. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 82(7). 1119–1125. 46 indexed citations

5.

DeVito, Jill. (2003). Metamorphic synchrony and aggregation as antipredator responses in American toads. Oikos. 103(1). 75–80. 30 indexed citations

6.

DeVito, Jill & Daniel R. Formanowicz. (2003). THE EFFECTS OF SIZE, SEX, AND REPRODUCTIVE CONDITION ON THERMAL AND DESICCATION STRESS IN A RIPARIAN SPIDER (PIRATA SEDENTARIUS, ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE). Journal of Arachnology. 31(2). 278–284. 31 indexed citations

7.

Chivers, Douglas P., Joseph M. Kiesecker, Adolfo Marco, et al.. (2001). Predator‐induced life history changes in amphibians: egg predation induces hatching. Oikos. 92(1). 135–142. 144 indexed citations

8.

DeVito, Jill, Douglas P. Chivers, Joseph M. Kiesecker, et al.. (1998). The Effects of Snake Predation on Metamorphosis of Western Toads,Bufo boreas(Amphibia, Bufonidae). Ethology. 104(3). 185–193. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact