Jian-Ping Hu

834 total citations · 1 hit paper
27 papers, 569 citations indexed

About

Jian-Ping Hu is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation. According to data from OpenAlex, Jian-Ping Hu has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 569 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 2 papers in Instrumentation. Recurrent topics in Jian-Ping Hu's work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (16 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (10 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (9 papers). Jian-Ping Hu is often cited by papers focused on Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (16 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (10 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (9 papers). Jian-Ping Hu collaborates with scholars based in China, Australia and Taiwan. Jian-Ping Hu's co-authors include F. Y. Wang, Zi-Gao Dai, G. Q. Zhang, Shuang-Xi Yi, Jun Yang, Peng Lin, Hilary I. Inyang, Jie Chen, Yupeng Yang and Lixin Xu and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

In The Last Decade

Jian-Ping Hu

25 papers receiving 486 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics

2023 144 citations Jian-Ping Hu, F. Y. Wang profile →

Peers

Jian-Ping Hu

AA

NHEP

INSTR

SNP

OCEAN

Jaswant K. Yadav India

A. Mourão Portugal

Eva-Maria Mueller United Kingdom

Joanna Dunkley United Kingdom

C. B. Netterfield United States

A. Boscaleri Italy

P. Serra United States

Zahid Ahmad Pakistan

J. B. Whitmore Australia

Alexander A. Kaurov United States

Jaswant K. Yadav India

Jian-Ping Hu

475 ×0.9

AA

157 ×0.8

NHEP

49 ×0.6

INSTR

38 ×1.0

SNP

10 ×0.4

OCEAN

Citations per year, relative to Jian-Ping Hu Jian-Ping Hu (= 1×) peers Jaswant K. Yadav

Countries citing papers authored by Jian-Ping Hu

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jian-Ping Hu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jian-Ping Hu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jian-Ping Hu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jian-Ping Hu

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jian-Ping Hu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jian-Ping Hu. The network helps show where Jian-Ping Hu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jian-Ping Hu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jian-Ping Hu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jian-Ping Hu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jian-Ping Hu. Jian-Ping Hu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Hu, Jian-Ping, et al.. (2025). Uncorrelated Estimations of H ₀ Redshift Evolution from DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Observations. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 979(2). L34–L34. 14 indexed citations

2.

Hu, Jian-Ping, et al.. (2025). Constraints on transition redshift utilizing the latest H(z) measurements and comments on the Hubble tension. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 542(2). 1063–1075. 1 indexed citations

3.

Hu, Jian-Ping, et al.. (2025). The Hubble Tension Resolved by the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Measurements. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 994(1). L22–L22. 2 indexed citations

4.

Wu, Qingwen, et al.. (2025). Measuring the Hubble constant using localized and nonlocalized fast radio bursts. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 698. A215–A215. 12 indexed citations

5.

Hu, Jian-Ping, et al.. (2024). Testing cosmic anisotropy with Padé approximations and the latest Pantheon+ sample. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 5 indexed citations

6.

Hu, Jian-Ping, et al.. (2024). Hints of New Physics for the Hubble Tension: Violation of Cosmological Principle. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 975(2). L36–L36. 7 indexed citations

7.

Yang, Yupeng, et al.. (2024). Standardizing the gamma-ray burst as a standard candle and applying it to cosmological probes: Constraints on the two-component dark energy model. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 689. A165–A165. 7 indexed citations

8.

Hu, Jian-Ping, et al.. (2024). Forecast of cosmological constraints with superluminous supernovae from the Chinese Space Station Telescope. Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy. 67(10).

9.

Yang, Yupeng, et al.. (2023). Constraints on the Cosmological Parameters with Three-Parameter Correlation of Gamma-Ray Bursts. The Astrophysical Journal. 953(1). 58–58. 12 indexed citations

10.

Yi, Shuang-Xi, et al.. (2023). Radio Plateaus in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows and Their Application in Cosmology. The Astrophysical Journal. 958(1). 74–74. 9 indexed citations

11.

Hu, Jian-Ping, et al.. (2023). Calibrating the effective magnitudes of type Ia supernovae with a model-independent method. Physical review. D. 108(8). 2 indexed citations

12.

Zhou, Z., et al.. (2023). A measurement of Hubble constant using cosmographic approach combining fast radio bursts and supernovae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 527(3). 7861–7870. 17 indexed citations

13.

Hu, Jian-Ping, et al.. (2023). Testing the cosmological principle with the Pantheon+ sample and the region-fitting method. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 681. A88–A88. 21 indexed citations

14.

Hu, Jian-Ping, et al.. (2023). Evidence of a decreasing trend for the Hubble constant. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 674. A45–A45. 52 indexed citations

15.

Hu, Jian-Ping & F. Y. Wang. (2022). High-redshift cosmography: Application and comparison with different methods. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 661. A71–A71. 29 indexed citations

16.

Wang, F. Y., Jian-Ping Hu, G. Q. Zhang, & Zi-Gao Dai. (2022). Standardized Long Gamma-Ray Bursts as a Cosmic Distance Indicator. The Astrophysical Journal. 924(2). 97–97. 49 indexed citations

17.

Hu, Jian-Ping, et al.. (2020). Testing cosmic anisotropy with Pantheon sample and quasars at high redshifts. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 24 indexed citations

18.

Hu, Jian-Ping, et al.. (2019). Geodesic Structure of a Non-linear Magnetic Charged Black Hole Surrounded by Quintessence*. Communications in Theoretical Physics. 71(10). 1187–1187. 4 indexed citations

19.

Hu, Jian-Ping, et al.. (2008). Patterns of subsidence in the lower Yangtze Delta of China: the case of the Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou Region. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 153(1-4). 61–72. 22 indexed citations

20.

Hu, Jian-Ping & Peng Lin. (1996). High-coercivity CoPt alloy films grown by sputtering. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 32(5). 4096–4098. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact