J.-F. Mathiot

1.6k total citations
57 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

J.-F. Mathiot is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, J.-F. Mathiot has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 21 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 10 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in J.-F. Mathiot's work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (44 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (26 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (18 papers). J.-F. Mathiot is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (44 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (26 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (18 papers). J.-F. Mathiot collaborates with scholars based in France, Russia and Switzerland. J.-F. Mathiot's co-authors include A. Bouyssy, S. Marcos, V. A. Karmanov, Aude Lejeune, Nguyen Van Giai, А. В. Смирнов, P. Grangé, U. Lombardo, Wei Zuo and B. Desplanques and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Reports and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

J.-F. Mathiot

56 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J.-F. Mathiot France 18 1.1k 423 226 148 78 57 1.2k
Wolfram Weise Germany 20 1.1k 1.0× 415 1.0× 497 2.2× 176 1.2× 75 1.0× 33 1.5k
Bikash Sinha India 22 1.5k 1.3× 364 0.9× 330 1.5× 151 1.0× 43 0.6× 113 1.6k
Wolfgang Bentz Japan 26 1.7k 1.5× 283 0.7× 218 1.0× 99 0.7× 92 1.2× 81 1.8k
K. Kubodera United States 28 2.2k 2.0× 411 1.0× 252 1.1× 116 0.8× 55 0.7× 113 2.4k
L. S. Celenza United States 20 1.5k 1.3× 536 1.3× 139 0.6× 82 0.6× 119 1.5× 107 1.6k
M. Farine France 17 797 0.7× 332 0.8× 184 0.8× 147 1.0× 46 0.6× 40 902
J. A. McNeil United States 16 1.1k 0.9× 489 1.2× 94 0.4× 93 0.6× 77 1.0× 47 1.2k
T. L. Ainsworth United States 12 883 0.8× 589 1.4× 612 2.7× 284 1.9× 72 0.9× 16 1.4k
A. Bouyssy France 17 909 0.8× 428 1.0× 123 0.5× 111 0.8× 33 0.4× 28 982
Masayuki Matsuzaki Japan 19 855 0.8× 389 0.9× 88 0.4× 67 0.5× 120 1.5× 63 992

Countries citing papers authored by J.-F. Mathiot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.-F. Mathiot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.-F. Mathiot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.-F. Mathiot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.-F. Mathiot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.-F. Mathiot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.-F. Mathiot. The network helps show where J.-F. Mathiot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.-F. Mathiot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.-F. Mathiot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.-F. Mathiot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.-F. Mathiot. J.-F. Mathiot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mathiot, J.-F.. (2021). The fate of the trace anomaly in a finite formulation of field theory. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 36(33).
2.
Grangé, P., et al.. (2010). Taylor-Lagrange renormalization scheme, Pauli-Villars subtraction, and light-front dynamics. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 82(2). 8 indexed citations
3.
Karmanov, V. A., J.-F. Mathiot, & А. В. Смирнов. (2010). Nonperturbative calculation of the anomalous magnetic moment in the Yukawa model within truncated Fock space. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 82(5). 17 indexed citations
4.
Karmanov, V. A., J.-F. Mathiot, & А. В. Смирнов. (2007). Regularization of the fermion self-energy and the electromagnetic vertex in the Yukawa model within light-front dynamics. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 75(4). 14 indexed citations
5.
Mathiot, J.-F., V. A. Karmanov, & А. В. Смирнов. (2005). Non-perturbative renormalization in Light Front Dynamics with Fock space truncation. 3 indexed citations
6.
Karmanov, V. A., J.-F. Mathiot, & А. В. Смирнов. (2004). Renormalized nonperturbative fermion model in covariant light-front dynamics. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 69(4). 13 indexed citations
7.
Irigaray, J.L., et al.. (2003). Modelling by percolation theory of the behaviour of natural coral used as bone substitute. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 48(21). 3611–3623. 9 indexed citations
8.
Bissey, F., J.-J. Dugne, & J.-F. Mathiot. (2002). Dynamical relativistic corrections to the leptonic decay width of heavy quarkonia. The European Physical Journal C. 24(1). 101–108. 4 indexed citations
9.
Zuo, Wei, et al.. (2002). EOS of Neutron-Rich Matter with a Microscopic Three-Body Force. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement. 146. 478–482. 1 indexed citations
10.
Bissey, F. & J.-F. Mathiot. (2000). Pseudo-scalar heavy meson decays in covariant light front dynamics. The European Physical Journal C. 16(1). 131–137. 1 indexed citations
11.
Mathiot, J.-F., et al.. (1997). From the leptonic width to the inelastic leptoproduction of $J/\psi$. Zeitschrift für Physik C. 75(3). 495–505. 1 indexed citations
12.
Marcos, S., et al.. (1996). A density-dependent effective interaction for relativistic Hartree-Fock calculations. Nuclear Physics A. 600(4). 529–543. 4 indexed citations
13.
Mathiot, J.-F. & J. Thanh Van Tran. (1995). The heart of the matter : from nuclear interactions to quark gluon dynamics. 2 indexed citations
14.
Mathiot, J.-F., et al.. (1993). Modification of the gluon structure function and leptoproduction by nuclear Fermi motion. Physics Letters B. 307(1-2). 177–181. 3 indexed citations
15.
Grangé, P., et al.. (1989). Consistent three-nucleon forces in the nuclear many-body problem. Physical Review C. 40(2). 1040–1060. 144 indexed citations
16.
Chanfray, G., J.-F. Mathiot, & Hans J. Pirner. (1989). Color dielectric approach to the nucleon and nuclear matter. Nuclear Physics A. 497. 247–252. 3 indexed citations
17.
Boisgard, R., J. Desbois, J.-F. Mathiot, & Christian Ngô. (1988). Quark-gluon plasma and mixed phase in an aggregation-percolation model. Nuclear Physics A. 489(4). 731–750. 5 indexed citations
18.
Bouyssy, A., S. Marcos, J.-F. Mathiot, & Nguyen Van Giai. (1985). Isovector-meson contributions in the Dirac-Hartree-Fock approach to nuclear matter. Physical Review Letters. 55(17). 1731–1733. 31 indexed citations
19.
Platchkov, S., J.M. Cavedon, J. C. Clémens, et al.. (1983). The magnetic form factor of 51V at very high momentum transfer. Physics Letters B. 131(4-6). 301–304. 18 indexed citations
20.
Desplanques, B. & J.-F. Mathiot. (1981). Contribution of meson exchange currents to the magnetic form factor of some medium-heavy nuclei. Nuclear Physics A. 358. 381–382. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026