Jess Tate

702 citations
51 papers · 489 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Jess Tate

49 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers

Jess Tate
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 317
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 42
  • Structural Biology 7
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 77
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 31
Replace Sam Coveney with:
Sam Coveney United Kingdom
Jaume Coll‐Font United States
Jatin Relan France
F. Hanser Austria
R. Modre Austria
Charulatha Ramanathan United States
Laura Bear France
Raja N. Ghanem United States
C. Viganotti Italy
María S. Guillem Spain
Jess Tate relative to Sam Coveney United Kingdom Sam Coveney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Sam Coveney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jess Tate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jess Tate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jess Tate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jess Tate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jess Tate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jess Tate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jess Tate. The network helps show where Jess Tate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jess Tate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jess Tate Line = papers co-authored together Jess Tate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201566
2 201144
3 201834
4 202030
5 201025
6 201923
7 202222
8 202117
9 201816
10 201915
11 202115
12 202114
13 201813
14 201812
15 202011
16 201710
17 20189
18 20189
19 20168
20 20216

About Jess Tate

Jess Tate is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Biomedical Engineering and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 51 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (28 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (9 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (7 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (7 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (6 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (6 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (5 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (317 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (42 citations), Structural Biology (7 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (77 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (31 citations). Jess Tate has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Rob MacLeod, Wilson Good, Brian Zenger, Brett Burton, Dana H. Brooks, Jake Bergquist, Peter van Dam, Kedar Aras, Jaume Coll‐Font and Akil Narayan. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Biology and Medicine, Heart Rhythm, Physiological Measurement, Annals of Biomedical Engineering and Frontiers in Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact