JENNIE SMITH

490 total citations
10 papers, 310 citations indexed

About

JENNIE SMITH is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, JENNIE SMITH has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 310 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 5 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in JENNIE SMITH's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers). JENNIE SMITH is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers). JENNIE SMITH collaborates with scholars based in United States. JENNIE SMITH's co-authors include Sharon I. Ort, Mark A. Riddle, Robert A. King, James F. Leckman, Maureen T. Hardin, Lawrence David Scahill, Donald J. Cohen, George M. Anderson, Matthew J. Van Hook and Kevin Y. Zhang and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Neuroscience and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

JENNIE SMITH

9 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
JENNIE SMITH United States 6 226 104 96 70 46 10 310
Scot Hill United States 8 34 0.2× 86 0.8× 138 1.4× 49 0.7× 24 0.5× 18 297
Jane L. Ebejer Australia 6 75 0.3× 138 1.3× 168 1.8× 33 0.5× 25 0.5× 8 329
Brynja B. Magnúsdóttir Iceland 9 23 0.1× 68 0.7× 107 1.1× 27 0.4× 45 1.0× 18 204
Célia Mam-Lam-Fook France 7 53 0.2× 87 0.8× 100 1.0× 37 0.5× 21 0.5× 8 228
Y.C. Janardhan Reddy India 11 212 0.9× 122 1.2× 68 0.7× 66 0.9× 50 1.1× 18 351
Joseph Frascella United States 7 102 0.5× 58 0.6× 27 0.3× 14 0.2× 82 1.8× 9 293
Sonia E. Lees Roitman United States 6 110 0.5× 204 2.0× 328 3.4× 55 0.8× 27 0.6× 8 424
Heike Eichele Norway 13 197 0.9× 230 2.2× 143 1.5× 53 0.8× 40 0.9× 22 426
Josep Salavert Spain 10 92 0.4× 86 0.8× 191 2.0× 39 0.6× 7 0.2× 17 276
Diana R. Djurfeldt Sweden 8 100 0.4× 84 0.8× 39 0.4× 53 0.8× 43 0.9× 10 246

Countries citing papers authored by JENNIE SMITH

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of JENNIE SMITH's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by JENNIE SMITH with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JENNIE SMITH more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by JENNIE SMITH

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by JENNIE SMITH. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by JENNIE SMITH. The network helps show where JENNIE SMITH may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of JENNIE SMITH

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of JENNIE SMITH. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of JENNIE SMITH based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with JENNIE SMITH. JENNIE SMITH is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Thompson, Jennifer L., S.C. McCool, JENNIE SMITH, et al.. (2025). Microglia remodeling in the visual thalamus of the DBA/2J mouse model of glaucoma. PLoS ONE. 20(5). e0323513–e0323513. 2 indexed citations
2.
McCool, S.C., et al.. (2025). Retinal and thalamic alterations in the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE. 20(3). e0319397–e0319397.
3.
SMITH, JENNIE, et al.. (2022). Loss of Retinogeniculate Synaptic Function in the DBA/2J Mouse Model of Glaucoma. eNeuro. 9(6). ENEURO.0421–22.2022. 6 indexed citations
4.
SMITH, JENNIE, et al.. (2022). Structural and Functional Plasticity in the Dorsolateral Geniculate Nucleus of Mice following Bilateral Enucleation. Neuroscience. 488. 44–59. 5 indexed citations
5.
SMITH, JENNIE, et al.. (2022). Mechanism for Altered Dark-Adapted Electroretinogram Responses in DBA/2J Mice Includes Pupil Dilation Deficits. Current Eye Research. 47(6). 897–907. 3 indexed citations
6.
Hook, Matthew J. Van, et al.. (2021). Neuronal and Synaptic Plasticity in the Visual Thalamus in Mouse Models of Glaucoma. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 14. 626056–626056. 20 indexed citations
7.
SMITH, JENNIE, et al.. (2019). Early-Stage Ocular Hypertension Alters Retinal Ganglion Cell Synaptic Transmission in the Visual Thalamus. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 13. 426–426. 20 indexed citations
8.
9.
Riddle, Mark A., Lawrence David Scahill, Robert A. King, et al.. (1992). Double-Blind, Crossover Trial of Fluoxetine and Placebo in Children and Adolescents with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 31(6). 1062–1069. 244 indexed citations
10.
Riddle, Mark A., Lawrence David Scahill, Robert A. King, et al.. (1992). Fluoxetine in the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Children and Adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 31(3). 575–575. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026