Jemima Petch

585 total citations
22 papers, 417 citations indexed

About

Jemima Petch is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jemima Petch has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 417 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Social Psychology, 12 papers in Clinical Psychology and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Jemima Petch's work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (16 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (7 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (6 papers). Jemima Petch is often cited by papers focused on Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (16 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (7 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (6 papers). Jemima Petch collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Hong Kong and Singapore. Jemima Petch's co-authors include W. Kim Halford, Debra Creedy, Jenny Gamble, Christopher A. Pepping, Jennifer Murray, Trevor G. Gates, Bonnie A. Clough, Analise O’Donovan, Yuan Cao and Andrew Bickerdike and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Clinical Psychology Review and Journal of Family Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Jemima Petch

21 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jemima Petch Australia 9 233 202 176 132 110 22 417
Danielle M. Mitnick United States 7 208 0.9× 156 0.8× 160 0.9× 136 1.0× 93 0.8× 20 374
Susanne N. Biehle United States 9 121 0.5× 131 0.6× 153 0.9× 72 0.5× 93 0.8× 13 303
Megan C. Goslin United States 5 116 0.5× 229 1.1× 116 0.7× 118 0.9× 98 0.9× 7 353
Jamie L. Kohn United States 9 263 1.1× 177 0.9× 105 0.6× 115 0.9× 58 0.5× 9 380
Harriet Curtis-Boles United States 6 164 0.7× 118 0.6× 79 0.4× 135 1.0× 154 1.4× 9 369
Ana Martínez‐Pampliega Spain 11 166 0.7× 256 1.3× 84 0.5× 99 0.8× 107 1.0× 57 424
Kami L. Schwerdtfeger United States 10 101 0.4× 309 1.5× 103 0.6× 45 0.3× 116 1.1× 13 428
Farah Qadir Pakistan 9 130 0.6× 181 0.9× 82 0.5× 75 0.6× 85 0.8× 12 399
Heidi Simoni Switzerland 9 146 0.6× 219 1.1× 171 1.0× 94 0.7× 75 0.7× 30 399
Erica E. Coates United States 11 78 0.3× 231 1.1× 69 0.4× 84 0.6× 142 1.3× 33 403

Countries citing papers authored by Jemima Petch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jemima Petch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jemima Petch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jemima Petch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jemima Petch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jemima Petch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jemima Petch. The network helps show where Jemima Petch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jemima Petch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jemima Petch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jemima Petch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jemima Petch. Jemima Petch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
3.
Cao, Yuan, et al.. (2021). Does Relationship Counselling for One Work? An Effectiveness Study of Routine Relationship Counselling Services Where Only One Individual Attends. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. 42(3). 320–335. 2 indexed citations
4.
Gates, Trevor G., et al.. (2021). Allyship, Social Justice Values, and Commitment at an Australian Social Service Organization. Journal of Social Service Research. 47(6). 796–807. 7 indexed citations
5.
Milić, Jelena, et al.. (2021). The Effectiveness of a Motivational Interviewing Treatment for Help-Seeking Problem Gamblers in a Community Organization. Journal of Gambling Studies. 38(2). 607–626. 2 indexed citations
6.
Halford, W. Kim, et al.. (2020). Brief Acrimony Scale – 8 (BACS-8) for Separated Parents – Development and Validation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 61(8). 574–581. 2 indexed citations
7.
Petch, Jemima. (2020). The Practice of Family Therapy: Key Elements Across Models. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. 41(1). 107–108. 1 indexed citations
8.
Halford, W. Kim, et al.. (2018). A randomized controlled trial comparing family mediation with and without motivational interviewing.. Journal of Family Psychology. 32(2). 269–275. 3 indexed citations
9.
Halford, W. Kim, et al.. (2016). Predictors of Engagement in Family Mediation and Outcomes for Families that Fail to Engage. Family Process. 57(1). 131–147. 7 indexed citations
10.
Halford, W. Kim, Christopher A. Pepping, & Jemima Petch. (2015). The Gap Between Couple Therapy Research Efficacy and Practice Effectiveness. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 42(1). 32–44. 34 indexed citations
11.
Halford, W. Kim, Jemima Petch, & Debra Creedy. (2015). Clinical Guide to Helping New Parents. DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven). 8 indexed citations
12.
Petch, Jemima, et al.. (2014). Psychological Distress in Australian Clients Seeking Family and Relationship Counselling and Mediation Services. Australian Psychologist. 49(1). 28–36. 5 indexed citations
13.
Petch, Jemima, et al.. (2014). Couple Counselling Outcomes in an Australian Not for Profit: Evidence for the Effectiveness of Couple Counselling Conducted Within Routine Practice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. 35(4). 445–461. 9 indexed citations
14.
Petch, Jemima, W. Kim Halford, Debra Creedy, & Jenny Gamble. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a couple relationship and coparenting program (Couple CARE for Parents) for high- and low-risk new parents.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 80(4). 662–673. 70 indexed citations
15.
Petch, Jemima, W. Kim Halford, Debra Creedy, & Jenny Gamble. (2012). Couple Relationship Education at the Transition to Parenthood: A Window of Opportunity to Reach High‐Risk Couples. Family Process. 51(4). 498–511. 33 indexed citations
16.
Halford, W. Kim, Jemima Petch, Debra Creedy, & Jenny Gamble. (2011). Intimate Partner Violence in Couples Seeking Relationship Education for the Transition to Parenthood. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 10(2). 152–168. 10 indexed citations
17.
Halford, W. Kim & Jemima Petch. (2010). Couple Psychoeducation for New Parents: Observed and Potential Effects on Parenting. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 13(2). 164–180. 28 indexed citations
18.
Halford, W. Kim, Jemima Petch, & Debra Creedy. (2009). Promoting a Positive Transition to Parenthood: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Couple Relationship Education. Prevention Science. 11(1). 89–100. 94 indexed citations
19.
Petch, Jemima & W. Kim Halford. (2008). Psycho-education to enhance couples' transition to parenthood. Clinical Psychology Review. 28(7). 1125–1137. 88 indexed citations
20.
Petch, Jemima. (2006). The Couple CARE for Parents Program: Enhancing Couple Relationships Across the Transition to Parenthood. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 58. 220–221. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Danielle M. Mitnick Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susanne N. Biehle Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Megan C. Goslin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jamie L. Kohn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Harriet Curtis-Boles Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ana Martínez‐Pampliega Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kami L. Schwerdtfeger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Farah Qadir Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Heidi Simoni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Erica E. Coates
Rankless by CCL
2026