This map shows the geographic impact of Jelle R. Kok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jelle R. Kok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jelle R. Kok more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jelle R. Kok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jelle R. Kok. The network helps show where Jelle R. Kok may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jelle R. Kok
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jelle R. Kok.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jelle R. Kok based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jelle R. Kok. Jelle R. Kok is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kok, Jelle R.. (2006). Cooperation and learning in cooperative multiagent systems. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).6 indexed citations
3.
Kok, Jelle R. & Nikos Vlassis. (2005). Using the max-plus algorithm for multiagent decision making in coordination graphs: Extended abstract. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
4.
Kok, Jelle R., et al.. (2005). Utile coordination: Learning interdependencies among cooperative agents. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 29–36.35 indexed citations
Kok, Jelle R. & Nikos Vlassis. (2005). Using the Max-Plus Algorithm for Multiagent Decision Making in Coordination Graphs.. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg). 359–360.3 indexed citations
7.
Kok, Jelle R. & Nikos Vlassis. (2004). Multi-agent Q-learning by context-specific coordination graphs. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 317–324.1 indexed citations
Kok, Jelle R. & Nikos Vlassis. (2004). Sparse Tabular Multiagent Q-learning ⁄. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 65–71.2 indexed citations
11.
Kok, Jelle R. & Nikos Vlassis. (2003). Distributed Decision Making of Robotic Agents. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).5 indexed citations
12.
Kok, Jelle R., Matthijs T. J. Spaan, & Nikos Vlassis. (2003). Multi-Robot Decision Making Using Coordination Graphs. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).30 indexed citations
13.
Kok, Jelle R. & Nikos Vlassis. (2003). The Pursuit Domain Package. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).9 indexed citations
14.
Boer, Remco C. de & Jelle R. Kok. (2002). The Incremental Development of a Synthetic Multi-Agent System: The UvA Trilearn 2001 Robotic Soccer Simulation Team.23 indexed citations
15.
Kok, Jelle R., Matthijs T. J. Spaan, & Nikos Vlassis. (2002). An approach to noncommunicative multiagent coordination in continuous domains. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 46–52.11 indexed citations
16.
Kok, Jelle R., et al.. (2002). UvA Trilearn 2002 Team Description. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).6 indexed citations
17.
Kok, Jelle R. & Nikos Vlassis. (2002). Mutual Modeling of Teammate Behavior. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).7 indexed citations
18.
Kok, Jelle R., Remco C. de Boer, & Nikos Vlassis. (2001). Towards an Optimal Scoring Policy for Simulated Soccer Agents. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.