Jeffrey J. Love
- Geophysics top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Oceanography top 5%
- Co-authors
- Paul A. BedrosianE. J. RiglerJ. L. GannonAnna KelbertJ. N. ThomasGreg LucasPete RileyArnaud Chulliat
- Topics
- Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (57 papers)Earthquake Detection and Analysis (43 papers)Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (35 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
Jeffrey J. Love
113 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Geophysics 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.1k
- Atmospheric Science 322
- Oceanography 175
Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey J. Love
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey J. Love's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey J. Love with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey J. Love more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey J. Love
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey J. Love. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey J. Love. The network helps show where Jeffrey J. Love may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeffrey J. Love
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeffrey J. Love. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeffrey J. Love based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jeffrey J. Love. Jeffrey J. Love is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 47 | |
| 14 | 64 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | A Continuous Long-Term Record of Magnetic-Storm Occurrence and Intensity | 0 |
| 17 | The 1989 Ms 7.1 Loma Prieta, California, Magnetic Earthquake Precursor Revisited | 2 |
| 18 | New substorm index derived from high-resolution geomagnetic field data at low latitude and its comparison with AE and ASY indices | 6 |
| 19 | Intermagnet and the Global Community of Magnetic Observatories | 1 |
| 20 | Financing university education: oasis or mirage? | 1 |
About Jeffrey J. Love
Jeffrey J. Love is a scholar working on Geophysics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Family Practice, having authored 118 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (57 papers), Earthquake Detection and Analysis (43 papers) and Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (35 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (1.3k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.1k citations) and Atmospheric Science (322 citations). Jeffrey J. Love has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Paul A. Bedrosian, E. J. Rigler, J. L. Gannon, Anna Kelbert, J. N. Thomas, Greg Lucas, Pete Riley, Arnaud Chulliat, E. W. Cliver and A. Pulkkinen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, The Astrophysical Journal and Physics Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.