Jed Appelman
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Bonnie ConnorNicholas JoyceMichael M. MerzenichJoseph L. HardyHenry W. MahnckeSharona M. AtkinsM. Elizabeth SandelJoseph Terdiman
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers)Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (3 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesStrokeArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Jed Appelman
7 papers receiving 627 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Psychiatry and Mental health 244
- Cognitive Neuroscience 207
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 176
- Rehabilitation 115
- Epidemiology 86
Countries citing papers authored by Jed Appelman
This map shows the geographic impact of Jed Appelman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jed Appelman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jed Appelman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jed Appelman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jed Appelman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jed Appelman. The network helps show where Jed Appelman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jed Appelman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jed Appelman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jed Appelman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jed Appelman. Jed Appelman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 81 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: A randomized, controlled studybreakdown → | 507 |
About Jed Appelman
Jed Appelman is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (49 citations), Rehabilitation (115 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (244 citations). Jed Appelman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Bonnie Connor, Nicholas Joyce, Michael M. Merzenich, Joseph L. Hardy, Henry W. Mahncke, Sharona M. Atkins, M. Elizabeth Sandel, Joseph Terdiman, Elizabeth K. Rasch and Leighton Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Stroke and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.