Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Variable selection using random forests
20101.9k citationsRobin Genuer, Jean‐Michel Poggi et al.Pattern Recognition Lettersprofile →
VSURF: An R Package for Variable Selection Using Random Forests
2015445 citationsRobin Genuer, Jean‐Michel Poggi et al.The R Journalprofile →
Random forests for global sensitivity analysis: A selective review
2020219 citationsAnestis Antoniadis, Sophie Lambert‐Lacroix et al.Reliability Engineering & System Safetyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Jean‐Michel Poggi
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean‐Michel Poggi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean‐Michel Poggi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean‐Michel Poggi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean‐Michel Poggi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean‐Michel Poggi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean‐Michel Poggi. The network helps show where Jean‐Michel Poggi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean‐Michel Poggi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean‐Michel Poggi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean‐Michel Poggi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jean‐Michel Poggi. Jean‐Michel Poggi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Antoniadis, Anestis, Sophie Lambert‐Lacroix, & Jean‐Michel Poggi. (2020). Random forests for global sensitivity analysis: A selective review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 206. 107312–107312.219 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Genuer, Robin, Jean‐Michel Poggi, & Christine Tuleau-Malot. (2019). Variable Selection Using Random Forests [R package VSURF version 1.1.0].3 indexed citations
Genuer, Robin, Jean‐Michel Poggi, & Christine Tuleau-Malot. (2015). VSURF: An R Package for Variable Selection Using Random Forests. The R Journal. 7(2). 19–19.445 indexed citations breakdown →
Poggi, Jean‐Michel, et al.. (2011). PM10 forecasting using clusterwise regression. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).2 indexed citations
Oppenheim, Georges, et al.. (2006). Wavelets and Their Applications (Digital Signal and Image Processing series).4 indexed citations
16.
Poggi, Jean‐Michel, et al.. (2006). Classification supervisée en grande dimension. Application à l'agrément de conduite automobile. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).1 indexed citations
Poggi, Jean‐Michel. (1994). Prévision non paramétrique de la consommation électrique. French digital mathematics library (Numdam). 42(4). 83–98.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.