Jayson B. Field

770 total citations
8 papers, 184 citations indexed

About

Jayson B. Field is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jayson B. Field has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 184 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 3 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Jayson B. Field's work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (7 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers). Jayson B. Field is often cited by papers focused on Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (7 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers). Jayson B. Field collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Jayson B. Field's co-authors include Tri A. Dinh, Michelle Benoit, Concepcion Diaz‐Arrastia, Raja Rabah, Robert H. Mathog, Wayne D. Lancaster, Lucie Grégoire, Herbert H. Dedo, Zaid Al-Wahab and Gunjal Garg and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, The Laryngoscope and Gynecologic Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Jayson B. Field

8 papers receiving 181 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jayson B. Field United States 5 76 71 70 38 35 8 184
Sophie Fuerst Germany 6 122 1.6× 108 1.5× 122 1.7× 31 0.8× 6 0.2× 12 186
Daniel Fix United States 7 161 2.1× 57 0.8× 33 0.5× 116 3.1× 23 0.7× 9 237
Martina Delle Marchette Italy 9 93 1.2× 36 0.5× 16 0.2× 148 3.9× 57 1.6× 16 230
Karen Pinto United States 10 24 0.3× 69 1.0× 76 1.1× 41 1.1× 19 0.5× 22 220
J. Quaas Germany 9 59 0.8× 111 1.6× 102 1.5× 97 2.6× 8 0.2× 18 220
Terumi Tanigawa Japan 8 188 2.5× 71 1.0× 43 0.6× 117 3.1× 4 0.1× 35 267
Margot H. Uijterwaal Netherlands 8 47 0.6× 145 2.0× 300 4.3× 17 0.4× 25 0.7× 10 327
Sonsoles Alonso Spain 8 108 1.4× 55 0.8× 15 0.2× 106 2.8× 23 0.7× 19 199
John E. Savage United States 11 186 2.4× 118 1.7× 134 1.9× 84 2.2× 12 0.3× 17 295
F. Pozzati Italy 9 118 1.6× 93 1.3× 22 0.3× 167 4.4× 7 0.2× 25 267

Countries citing papers authored by Jayson B. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jayson B. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jayson B. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jayson B. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jayson B. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jayson B. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jayson B. Field. The network helps show where Jayson B. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jayson B. Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jayson B. Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jayson B. Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jayson B. Field. Jayson B. Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Nandalur, Sirisha, et al.. (2020). Combined Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy Improves Disease-Free Survival for Uterine Serous Cancer. Advances in Radiation Oncology. 5(6). 1232–1239. 2 indexed citations
2.
Ye, Hong, Sirisha Nandalur, Zaid Al-Wahab, et al.. (2020). Outcomes After Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Endometrial Cancer in Patients With No Prior Adjuvant Therapy: An Institutional Review. Advances in Radiation Oncology. 5(6). 1240–1247. 5 indexed citations
3.
Nandalur, Sirisha, et al.. (2020). Sequencing of Adjuvant Chemoradiation for Advanced Stage Endometrial Cancer. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 43(11). 755–761. 1 indexed citations
4.
Al-Wahab, Zaid, et al.. (2019). Outcomes and Toxicity Following Adjuvant Vaginal Brachytherapy for Stage I and II Endometrial Cancer Using 30 Gy in 6 fractions – An Institutional Analysis. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 105(1). E348–E349. 1 indexed citations
5.
Bahado‐Singh, Ray, Amit A. Lugade, Jayson B. Field, et al.. (2017). Metabolomic prediction of endometrial cancer. Metabolomics. 14(1). 6–6. 27 indexed citations
6.
Garg, Gunjal, Jay P. Shah, Eugene P. Toy, et al.. (2011). Intra-operative detection of nodal metastasis in early stage cervical cancer: A survey of the practice patterns of SGO members. Gynecologic Oncology. 121(1). 143–147. 19 indexed citations
7.
Field, Jayson B., Michelle Benoit, Tri A. Dinh, & Concepcion Diaz‐Arrastia. (2006). Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surgical Endoscopy. 21(2). 244–246. 52 indexed citations
8.
Dedo, Herbert H., Raja Rabah, Jayson B. Field, et al.. (2004). Integration of Human Papillomavirus Type 11 in Recurrent Respiratory Papilloma‐Associated Cancer. The Laryngoscope. 114(11). 1906–1909. 77 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026