Jay Lawrence

468 total citations
12 papers, 309 citations indexed

About

Jay Lawrence is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jay Lawrence has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 309 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 11 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 3 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Jay Lawrence's work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (10 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (9 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (6 papers). Jay Lawrence is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Information and Cryptography (10 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (9 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (6 papers). Jay Lawrence collaborates with scholars based in United States, Austria and Mexico. Jay Lawrence's co-authors include Anton Zeilinger, Časlav Brukner, Leonidas E. Ocola, Srivatsan Chakram, Nelson L. C. Leung, David A. Czaplewski, Ravi Naik, Yao Lu, Jens Koch and Nathan Earnest and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A and Europhysics Letters (EPL).

In The Last Decade

Jay Lawrence

12 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jay Lawrence United States	9	237	230	33	32	20	12	309
J. L. Romero Mexico	10	246 1.0×	263 1.1×	29 0.9×	58 1.8×	23 1.1×	26	342
Cihan Okay Canada	8	291 1.2×	305 1.3×	53 1.6×	43 1.3×	13 0.7×	26	371
Guillaume Aubrun France	10	156 0.7×	138 0.6×	15 0.5×	31 1.0×	6 0.3×	23	256
Robert Zeier Germany	12	224 0.9×	251 1.1×	18 0.5×	41 1.3×	11 0.6×	25	342
Lech Jakóbczyk Poland	11	289 1.2×	316 1.4×	13 0.4×	60 1.9×	9 0.5×	30	383
Mladen Pavičić Croatia	12	358 1.5×	381 1.7×	95 2.9×	46 1.4×	21 1.1×	57	478
Jean-Gabriel Luque France	9	125 0.5×	126 0.5×	32 1.0×	39 1.2×	5 0.3×	29	244
Martin Fraas Switzerland	12	196 0.8×	355 1.5×	70 2.1×	115 3.6×	12 0.6×	33	510
Giulio Salvatori United States	8	78 0.3×	86 0.4×	8 0.2×	48 1.5×	10 0.5×	9	248
А. М. Чеботарев Russia	10	180 0.8×	218 0.9×	8 0.2×	117 3.7×	7 0.3×	61	381

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Lawrence

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Lawrence's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Lawrence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Lawrence more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Lawrence

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Lawrence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Lawrence. The network helps show where Jay Lawrence may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jay Lawrence

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jay Lawrence. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jay Lawrence based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jay Lawrence. Jay Lawrence is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Lawrence, Jay, Marcin Markiewicz, & Marek Żukowski. (2023). Relative Facts of Relational Quantum Mechanics are Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics. Quantum. 7. 1015–1015. 8 indexed citations

2.

Lawrence, Jay. (2023). Pointers for Quantum Measurement Theory. Foundations of Physics. 53(4). 1 indexed citations

3.

Earnest, Nathan, Srivatsan Chakram, Yao Lu, et al.. (2018). Realization of a Λ System with Metastable States of a Capacitively Shunted Fluxonium. Physical Review Letters. 120(15). 76 indexed citations

4.

Lawrence, Jay. (2017). Mermin inequalities for perfect correlations in many-qutrit systems. Physical review. A. 95(4). 11 indexed citations

5.

Klimov, A. B., et al.. (2015). Maximally entangled states of four nonbinary particles. Physical Review A. 91(1). 9 indexed citations

6.

Lawrence, Jay. (2014). Rotational covariance and Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger theorems for three or more particles of any dimension. Physical Review A. 89(1). 20 indexed citations

7.

Lawrence, Jay. (2011). Entanglement patterns in mutually unbiased basis sets. Physical Review A. 84(2). 13 indexed citations

8.

Lawrence, Jay. (2004). Mutually unbiased bases and trinary operator sets for N qutrits (10 pages). Physical Review A. 70(1). 12302. 1 indexed citations

9.

Lawrence, Jay. (2004). Mutually unbiased bases and trinary operator sets forNqutrits. Physical Review A. 70(1). 37 indexed citations

10.

Lawrence, Jay, Časlav Brukner, & Anton Zeilinger. (2002). Mutually unbiased binary observable sets onNqubits. Physical Review A. 65(3). 112 indexed citations

11.

Lawrence, Jay, et al.. (2002). Persistence of exponential decay for metastable quantum states at long times. Europhysics Letters (EPL). 57(5). 632–638. 13 indexed citations

12.

Lawrence, Jay. (2002). Nonexponential decay at late times and a different Zeno paradox. Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics. 4(4). S446–S449. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact