Jay K. Brinker

875 total citations
21 papers, 583 citations indexed

About

Jay K. Brinker is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jay K. Brinker has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 583 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 8 papers in Clinical Psychology and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Jay K. Brinker's work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers) and Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (4 papers). Jay K. Brinker is often cited by papers focused on Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers) and Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (4 papers). Jay K. Brinker collaborates with scholars based in Australia and Canada. Jay K. Brinker's co-authors include David J. A. Dozois, Roger Covin, Erin Walsh, Kristen Pammer, Ross B. Wilkinson, Davina French, Carl I. Moller, Robert J. Tait, Julie Aitken Harris and Pamela Roberts and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Clinical Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Jay K. Brinker

21 papers receiving 558 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jay K. Brinker Australia	10	358	285	102	60	57	21	583
Tierney P. McMahon United States	8	401 1.1×	299 1.0×	162 1.6×	53 0.9×	46 0.8×	10	571
Martin Wolgast Sweden	7	465 1.3×	310 1.1×	168 1.6×	42 0.7×	76 1.3×	17	673
Robert N. Brockman Australia	11	479 1.3×	226 0.8×	192 1.9×	42 0.7×	52 0.9×	28	655
Danielle J. Maack United States	12	382 1.1×	289 1.0×	196 1.9×	68 1.1×	108 1.9×	17	608
Fabiano Koich Miguel Brazil	13	303 0.8×	140 0.5×	117 1.1×	69 1.1×	78 1.4×	62	575
Yongrae Cho South Korea	11	415 1.2×	304 1.1×	103 1.0×	32 0.5×	30 0.5×	52	604
Lea Rood Netherlands	7	483 1.3×	387 1.4×	142 1.4×	112 1.9×	56 1.0×	7	624
Michelle Heffner United States	10	450 1.3×	243 0.9×	108 1.1×	36 0.6×	36 0.6×	11	570
Jafar Hasani Iran	12	320 0.9×	192 0.7×	106 1.0×	73 1.2×	73 1.3×	130	627
Kristina Conroy United States	10	356 1.0×	141 0.5×	84 0.8×	59 1.0×	103 1.8×	30	509

Countries citing papers authored by Jay K. Brinker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay K. Brinker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay K. Brinker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay K. Brinker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay K. Brinker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay K. Brinker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay K. Brinker. The network helps show where Jay K. Brinker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jay K. Brinker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jay K. Brinker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jay K. Brinker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jay K. Brinker. Jay K. Brinker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Findlay, Bruce, et al.. (2019). Individual differences in the way observers perceive humour styles. European Journal of Humour Research. 7(2). 116–136. 3 indexed citations

Walsh, Erin & Jay K. Brinker. (2016). Short and Sweet? Length and Informative Content of Open-Ended Responses Using SMS as a Research Mode. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 21(1). 87–100. 4 indexed citations

Walsh, Erin & Jay K. Brinker. (2016). Is SMS APPropriate?. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 35(1). 63–69. 1 indexed citations

Walsh, Erin & Jay K. Brinker. (2015). Should participants be given a mobile phone, or use their own? Effects of novelty vs utility. Telematics and Informatics. 33(1). 25–33. 10 indexed citations

Walsh, Erin & Jay K. Brinker. (2015). Rapid Communication: Delay between recruitment and participation impacts on preinclusion attrition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 68(4). 635–640. 1 indexed citations

Walsh, Erin & Jay K. Brinker. (2015). Temporal Considerations for Self-Report Research Using Short Message Service. Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications. 28(4). 200–206. 5 indexed citations

Brinker, Jay K., et al.. (2014). Ruminative thought style and personality. Personality and Individual Differences. 60. S41–S41. 3 indexed citations

Walsh, Erin, Janie Busby Grant, & Jay K. Brinker. (2014). Methodological advances regarding mental time travel. Personality and Individual Differences. 60. S36–S36. 1 indexed citations

Brinker, Jay K., et al.. (2014). Self-compassion, a better alternative to rumination than distraction as a response to negative mood. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 10(5). 447–457. 34 indexed citations

10.

Brinker, Jay K., et al.. (2014). Ruminative thinking style and the MMPI-2-RF. Personality and Individual Differences. 66. 102–105. 9 indexed citations

11.

Brinker, Jay K.. (2013). Rumination and reminiscence in older adults: implications for clinical practice. European Journal of Ageing. 10(3). 223–227. 16 indexed citations

12.

Brinker, Jay K., et al.. (2013). Exploring the Relationship between Rumination, Self-compassion, and Mood. Self and Identity. 13(4). 449–459. 76 indexed citations

13.

Brinker, Jay K., et al.. (2013). The Game of Late Life: A Novel Education Activity for the Psychology of Ageing. Educational Gerontology. 40(2). 91–101. 5 indexed citations

14.

Pammer, Kristen, et al.. (2013). Process-oriented guided-inquiry learning improves long-term retention of information. AJP Advances in Physiology Education. 37(3). 233–241. 37 indexed citations

15.

Tait, Robert J., Jay K. Brinker, Carl I. Moller, & Davina French. (2013). Rumination, Substance Use, and Self‐Harm in a Representative Australian Adult Sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 70(3). 283–293. 11 indexed citations

16.

Walsh, Erin & Jay K. Brinker. (2012). Evaluation of a Short Message Service Diary Methodology in a Nonclinical, Naturalistic Setting. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking. 15(11). 615–618. 3 indexed citations

17.

Brinker, Jay K. & David J. A. Dozois. (2008). Ruminative thought style and depressed mood. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 65(1). 1–19. 266 indexed citations

18.

Brinker, Jay K., et al.. (2006). The Importance of Importance. Journal of Individual Differences. 27(4). 193–198. 6 indexed citations

19.

Dozois, David J. A., Roger Covin, & Jay K. Brinker. (2003). Normative data on cognitive measures of depression.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 71(1). 71–80. 56 indexed citations

20.

Dozois, David J. A., Roger Covin, & Jay K. Brinker. (2003). Normative data on cognitive measures of depression.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 71(1). 71–80. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact