Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
EEG-Based Emotion Recognition: A State-of-the-Art Review of Current Trends and Opportunities
2020241 citationsJames Mountstephens, Jason Teo et al.profile →
An Industrial IoT-Based Blockchain-Enabled Secure Searchable Encryption Approach for Healthcare Systems Using Neural Network
2022139 citationsRahim Khan, Jason Teo et al.Sensorsprofile →
Mental Health Prediction Using Machine Learning: Taxonomy, Applications, and Challenges
This map shows the geographic impact of Jason Teo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jason Teo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jason Teo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jason Teo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jason Teo. The network helps show where Jason Teo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jason Teo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jason Teo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jason Teo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jason Teo. Jason Teo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Teo, Jason, et al.. (2020). Pushing the boundaries of EEG-based emotion classification using consumer-grade wearable brain-computer interfacing devices and ensemble classifiers. UMS Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sabah).2 indexed citations
On, Chin Kim, et al.. (2018). A CIMB Stock Price Prediction Case Study with Feedforward Neural Network and Recurrent Neural Network. Journal of Telecommunication Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC). 10. 89–94.7 indexed citations
12.
Teo, Jason, et al.. (2018). Preference Classification Using Electroencephalography (EEG) and Deep Learning. Journal of Telecommunication Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC). 10. 87–91.11 indexed citations
Teo, Jason, et al.. (2014). Empirically Comparing Three Multi-Objective Optimization Approaches for the Automated Evolution of Snake-Like Modular Robots. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 175–183.1 indexed citations
15.
Teo, Jason, et al.. (2014). Integrating Evolutionary Robotics with 3D Printing for Rapid Fabrication and Deployment of a Physically-Simulated Autonomous Six Articulated-Wheeled Robot. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 184–191.1 indexed citations
Teo, Jason. (2005). EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION FOR AUTOMATIC SYNTHESIS OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK ROBOT CONTROLLERS. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science. 18(2). 34–62.5 indexed citations
19.
Teo, Jason, et al.. (2005). A parameterless differential evolution optimizer. International Conference on Systems. 330–335.1 indexed citations
20.
Teo, Jason, et al.. (2003). Neuro-Morpho Evolution: What will happen if our body is not symmetric?.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.