Jason Smith

3.5k total citations
57 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Jason Smith is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Jason Smith has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Oncology, 19 papers in Surgery and 8 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Jason Smith's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (19 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (9 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers). Jason Smith is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (19 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (9 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers). Jason Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Jason Smith's co-authors include Paris Tekkis, Alun H. Davies, Alexander G. Heriot, R M Greenhalgh, M Guest, J D Stamatakis, Andrew Garratt, Diane Yendol‐Hoppey, Mirka Koro‐Ljungberg and Michael R. Thompson and has published in prestigious journals such as Hepatology, Annals of Surgery and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Jason Smith

56 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jason Smith United Kingdom 25 1.1k 740 330 266 216 57 2.1k
Andrew G. Shuman United States 29 616 0.5× 656 0.9× 182 0.6× 236 0.9× 70 0.3× 161 2.5k
James Green United Kingdom 32 456 0.4× 997 1.3× 26 0.1× 324 1.2× 186 0.9× 145 3.5k
Jeffrey Landercasper United States 31 1.3k 1.2× 561 0.8× 43 0.1× 155 0.6× 204 0.9× 88 2.9k
Roshni Kulkarni United States 34 220 0.2× 116 0.2× 191 0.6× 67 0.3× 145 0.7× 147 3.4k
Mitchel S. Hoffman United States 29 1.2k 1.1× 409 0.6× 95 0.3× 654 2.5× 62 0.3× 172 2.9k
Theodoor E. Nieboer Netherlands 21 965 0.9× 99 0.1× 47 0.1× 151 0.6× 41 0.2× 46 2.8k
Giuseppe Pantaleo Italy 20 262 0.2× 404 0.5× 72 0.2× 103 0.4× 40 0.2× 53 1.7k
Michael Peek Australia 29 479 0.4× 124 0.2× 24 0.1× 289 1.1× 73 0.3× 111 3.1k
Julie Sanders United Kingdom 22 302 0.3× 185 0.3× 18 0.1× 257 1.0× 118 0.5× 114 2.0k
Staffan Lindblad Sweden 29 478 0.4× 234 0.3× 12 0.0× 385 1.4× 133 0.6× 68 3.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Jason Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jason Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jason Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jason Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jason Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jason Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jason Smith. The network helps show where Jason Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jason Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jason Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jason Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jason Smith. Jason Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Aseem, Rabiya, Oliver Warren, Sarah Mills, Jason Smith, & Nikhil Pawa. (2020). Adjusting to the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and opportunities of frontline colorectal cancer teams in the UK. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 35(9). 1783–1785. 6 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Jason, et al.. (2019). Towards a Hybrid Recommendation System for a Sound Library.. 10 indexed citations
3.
Simillis, Constantinos, Nikhil Lal, Gianluca Pellino, et al.. (2019). A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing treatments for faecal incontinence. International Journal of Surgery. 66. 37–47. 17 indexed citations
4.
Thomas, James C., et al.. (2016). What systems are essential to achieving the sustainable development goals and what will it take to marshal them?. Health Policy and Planning. 31(10). 1445–1447. 14 indexed citations
5.
Hubbard, Thomas, et al.. (2015). Jejunal diverticulum enterolith causing perforation and upper abdominal peritonitis. BMJ Case Reports. 2015. bcr2015210095–bcr2015210095. 7 indexed citations
6.
Velde, Cornelis J.�H. van de, Petra G. Boelens, Pieter J. Tanis, et al.. (2013). Experts reviews of the multidisciplinary consensus conference colon and rectal cancer 2012. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 40(4). 454–468. 49 indexed citations
7.
Gijn, W. van, C.B.M. van den Broek, Paweł Mroczkowski, et al.. (2012). The EURECCA project: Data items scored by European colorectal cancer audit registries. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 38(6). 467–471. 24 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Jason, G. Netuveli, Simon Sleight, et al.. (2012). Development of a social morbidity score in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis as a potential guide to treatment. Colorectal Disease. 14(5). e250–7. 8 indexed citations
9.
Cornish, Julie, et al.. (2011). The National Bowel Cancer Audit Project: what do trusts think of the National Bowel Cancer Audit and how can it be improved?. Techniques in Coloproctology. 15(1). 53–59. 5 indexed citations
10.
11.
Tekkis, Paris, Richard E. Lovegrove, Henry S. Tilney, et al.. (2009). Long‐term failure and function after restorative proctocolectomy – a multi‐centre study of patients from the UK national ileal pouch registry. Colorectal Disease. 12(5). 433–441. 97 indexed citations
12.
Tilney, Henry S., Richard E. Lovegrove, Jason Smith, Michael R. Thompson, & Paris Tekkis. (2009). The National Bowel Cancer Project. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 52(6). 1046–1053. 17 indexed citations
13.
Tan, Emile, et al.. (2007). The United Kingdom National Bowel Cancer Project – Epidemiology and surgical risk in the elderly. European Journal of Cancer. 43(15). 2285–2294. 43 indexed citations
14.
Tekkis, Paris, Jason Smith, Alexander G. Heriot, et al.. (2006). A National Study on Lymph Node Retrieval in Resectional Surgery for Colorectal Cancer. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 49(11). 1673–1683. 117 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Jason, et al.. (2005). A comparison of serial halving and the rule of nines as a pre-hospital assessment tool in burns. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 58(7). 957–967. 32 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Jason, et al.. (2005). Do Same-Sex Couples Have a Right to Marry? The State of the Conversation Today. Yale journal of law and feminism. 17(1). 3. 1 indexed citations
17.
Tekkis, Paris, Alexander G. Heriot, Olivia Smith, et al.. (2005). Long‐term outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy for Crohn's disease and indeterminate colitis. Colorectal Disease. 7(3). 218–223. 68 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Jason, et al.. (2005). Temperature – The forgotten vital sign. Accident and Emergency Nursing. 13(4). 247–250. 7 indexed citations
19.
Heriot, Alexander G., et al.. (2005). Management and Outcome of Pouch-Vaginal Fistulas Following Restorative Proctocolectomy. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 48(3). 451–458. 53 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Jason, Andrew Garratt, M Guest, R M Greenhalgh, & Alun H. Davies. (1999). Evaluating and improving health-related quality of life in patients with varicose veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 30(4). 710–719. 221 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026