Jason Mak

1.9k total citations
12 papers, 72 citations indexed

About

Jason Mak is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Jason Mak has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 72 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 4 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Jason Mak's work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers) and Eosinophilic Esophagitis (2 papers). Jason Mak is often cited by papers focused on Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers) and Eosinophilic Esophagitis (2 papers). Jason Mak collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Jason Mak's co-authors include G. Condous, Fatima El‐Assaad, Mathew Leonardi, Deevia Kotecha, Ralph Boulton, Neel Sharma, Benjamin Disney, Neeraj Bhala, Ajay Verma and Uday N. Shivaji and has published in prestigious journals such as Endoscopy, Frontiers in Endocrinology and Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Jason Mak

11 papers receiving 72 citations

Peers

Jason Mak

RM

OG

IMMUN

PHEOH

SURGE

Yaryna Boyko Ukraine

Н. В. Косей Ukraine

Jharna Kumbang United Kingdom

Raminta Baušytė Lithuania

Haidy Elazzamy United States

Raoul Orvieto Israel

Mohamed Gamal Ibrahim Germany

Valeria Villegas Peru

Liisu Saavalainen Finland

Larisa Dizdarević‐Hudić Bosnia and Herzegovina

Yaryna Boyko Ukraine

Jason Mak

52 ×0.9

RM

9 ×0.3

OG

37 ×1.5

IMMUN

25 ×2.8

PHEOH

7 ×1.2

SURGE

Citations per year, relative to Jason Mak Jason Mak (= 1×) peers Yaryna Boyko

Countries citing papers authored by Jason Mak

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jason Mak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jason Mak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jason Mak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jason Mak

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jason Mak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jason Mak. The network helps show where Jason Mak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jason Mak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jason Mak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jason Mak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jason Mak. Jason Mak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Mak, Jason, Mercedes Espada, S. Reid, et al.. (2024). Inter‐observer reproducibility of the 2021 AAGL Endometriosis Classification. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 65(1). 101–106.

2.

Mak, Jason, Allie Eathorne, Mathew Leonardi, et al.. (2023). External Validation of the “2021 AAGL Endometriosis Classification”: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 30(5). 374–381. 4 indexed citations

3.

Mak, Jason, et al.. (2023). The bidirectional relationship between endometriosis and microbiome. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 14. 1110824–1110824. 35 indexed citations

4.

Leonardi, Mathew, et al.. (2022). An Ultrasound-based Prediction Model to Predict Ureterolysis during Laparoscopic Endometriosis Surgery. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 29(10). 1170–1177. 3 indexed citations

5.

Mak, Jason, et al.. (2022). Effectiveness of ultrasound for endometriosis diagnosis. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 34(5). 324–331. 10 indexed citations

6.

Mak, Jason, et al.. (2022). ‘Seeing is believing’: arguing for diagnostic laparoscopy as a diagnostic test for endometriosis. Reproduction and Fertility. 3(3). C23–C28. 7 indexed citations

7.

Mak, Jason, et al.. (2020). Office hysteroscopy: back to the future!. Climacteric. 23(4). 350–354. 5 indexed citations

8.

Kotecha, Deevia, Jason Mak, Neel Sharma, et al.. (2019). PTU-072 A multi-centre review of acute upper GI bleeding; can blood urea levels aid diagnosis?. A153.2–A153. 1 indexed citations

9.

Smith, Samuel C., Rosanna Cannatelli, Alina Bazarova, et al.. (2019). Performance measures in inflammatory bowel disease surveillance colonoscopy: Implementing changes to practice improves performance. Digestive Endoscopy. 32(4). 592–599. 3 indexed citations

10.

Kotecha, Deevia, Jason Mak, Neel Sharma, et al.. (2019). A multicentre review of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding; a raised urea:creatinine ratio aids diagnosis. Clinical Medicine. 19(Suppl 3). 3–4. 1 indexed citations

11.

Smith, Samuel C., Rosanna Cannatelli, Neil Sharma, et al.. (2019). PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN IBD SURVEILLANCE COLONOSCOPY- IMPLEMENTING CHANGES TO PRACTICE IMPROVES PERFORMANCE. Endoscopy. 1 indexed citations

12.

Kotecha, Deevia, Jason Mak, Neel Sharma, et al.. (2019). A multicentre review of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding; a raised urea:creatinine ratio aids diagnosis. Clinical Medicine. 19(3). s3–s4. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact