Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Process Model of the Formation of Spatial Presence Experiences
2007544 citationsWerner Wirth, Tilo Hartmann et al.Media Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jari Laarni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jari Laarni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jari Laarni more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jari Laarni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jari Laarni. The network helps show where Jari Laarni may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jari Laarni
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jari Laarni.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jari Laarni based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jari Laarni. Jari Laarni is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Laarni, Jari, Niklas Ravaja, Timo Saari, et al.. (2015). Ways to measure presence. Review and future directions. Springer eBooks. 139–185.1 indexed citations
9.
Aaltonen, Iina, et al.. (2015). Envisioning e-Justice for Criminal Justice Chain in Finland. 13(1). 56–66.2 indexed citations
10.
Hartmann, Tilo, Werner Wirth, Holger Schramm, et al.. (2015). The Spatial Presence Experience Scale (SPES). Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications. 28(1). 1–15.199 indexed citations
11.
Savioja, Paula, Leena Norros, Marja Liinasuo, & Jari Laarni. (2011). Human Factors Engineering: current practices and development needs in Finland.2 indexed citations
Laarni, Jari, et al.. (2009). Realizing the information rich design for the Loviisa nuclear power plant. 2146–2154.9 indexed citations
14.
Laarni, Jari, et al.. (2008). Designing large screen displays for process monitoring and control.1 indexed citations
15.
Laarni, Jari, et al.. (2007). A step towards more agile and adaptive management of nuclear power plant control room renewals: Lessons learned from a project in Finland.1 indexed citations
16.
Wirth, Werner, Tilo Hartmann, Saskia Böcking, et al.. (2007). A Process Model of the Formation of Spatial Presence Experiences. Media Psychology. 9(3). 493–525.544 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Laarni, Jari & Leena Norros. (2006). Control room modernization at Finnish nuclear power plants - Two projects compared. 890–897.2 indexed citations
18.
Saari, Timo, Niklas Ravaja, Jari Laarni, & Marko Turpeinen. (2005). User Controlled Emotional Regulation System for Games Based on Form Factor Adaptations. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.1 indexed citations
19.
Ravaja, Niklas, Timo Saari, Jari Laarni, et al.. (2005). The Psychophysiology of Video Gaming: Phasic Emotional Responses to Game Events. 3.43 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.