Jared D. Ament

742 total citations
31 papers, 475 citations indexed

About

Jared D. Ament is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jared D. Ament has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 475 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 16 papers in Surgery and 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Jared D. Ament's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (15 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (5 papers). Jared D. Ament is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (15 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (5 papers). Jared D. Ament collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and Austria. Jared D. Ament's co-authors include Kee D. Kim, Claes H. Dohlman, Amit Todani, Joseph B. Ciolino, Zhuo Yang, Michael W. Belin, James Chodosh, Pierce D. Nunley, Marcus B. Stone and Sandra Spurr-Michaud and has published in prestigious journals such as Spine, Ophthalmology and Neurosurgery.

In The Last Decade

Jared D. Ament

30 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jared D. Ament United States 12 222 207 164 163 44 31 475
Christian Swinney United States 9 48 0.2× 17 0.1× 129 0.8× 181 1.1× 59 1.3× 16 328
J. Brent Bond United States 11 79 0.4× 38 0.2× 24 0.1× 67 0.4× 199 4.5× 14 306
Vannessa Leung Australia 10 31 0.1× 56 0.3× 70 0.4× 171 1.0× 23 0.5× 14 320
Dan B. Rootman Canada 13 121 0.5× 60 0.3× 110 0.7× 82 0.5× 140 3.2× 23 383
Kerry Jordan United Kingdom 11 109 0.5× 30 0.1× 30 0.2× 38 0.2× 195 4.4× 17 360
Matthew Gardiner United States 11 82 0.4× 25 0.1× 16 0.1× 73 0.4× 260 5.9× 26 322
Achal Patel United States 12 13 0.1× 36 0.2× 55 0.3× 232 1.4× 59 1.3× 25 419
Z Nagy Hungary 10 29 0.1× 22 0.1× 20 0.1× 37 0.2× 18 0.4× 32 392
Theodossios Birbilis Greece 8 18 0.1× 23 0.1× 46 0.3× 57 0.3× 8 0.2× 36 255
Stephanie Payne United States 10 47 0.2× 23 0.1× 21 0.1× 53 0.3× 50 1.1× 15 323

Countries citing papers authored by Jared D. Ament

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jared D. Ament's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jared D. Ament with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jared D. Ament more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jared D. Ament

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jared D. Ament. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jared D. Ament. The network helps show where Jared D. Ament may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jared D. Ament

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jared D. Ament. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jared D. Ament based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jared D. Ament. Jared D. Ament is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ament, Jared D., et al.. (2025). The First Grade III Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Treated With the Novel 360° Artificial Disc/Artificial Facet Replacement Solution. The International Journal of Spine Surgery. 19(4). 362–369.
3.
Ament, Jared D., et al.. (2023). Intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine surgery: large database analysis of cost-effectiveness. North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ). 14. 100206–100206. 11 indexed citations
4.
Ament, Jared D., et al.. (2022). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Silicon Nitride and Biomaterial Modulus as it Relates to Subsidence Risk in Spinal Fusion Surgery. North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ). 12. 100168–100168. 7 indexed citations
5.
Thaçi, Bart, et al.. (2021). Cost-Effectiveness of Peptide Enhanced Bone Graft i-Factor versus Use of Local Autologous Bone in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research. Volume 13. 681–691. 5 indexed citations
6.
Ament, Jared D., Bart Thaçi, Zhuo Yang, et al.. (2019). Postoperative direct health care costs of lumbar discectomy are reduced with the use of a novel annular closure device in high-risk patients. The Spine Journal. 19(7). 1170–1179. 4 indexed citations
7.
Thaçi, Bart, Matthew J. McGirt, Joshua M. Ammerman, et al.. (2019). <p>Reduction of direct costs in high-risk lumbar discectomy patients during the 90-day post-operative period through annular closure</p>. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research. Volume 11. 191–197. 2 indexed citations
8.
Ament, Jared D., Bart Thaçi, Zhuo Yang, et al.. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of a Bone-anchored Annular Closure Device Versus Conventional Lumbar Discectomy in Treating Lumbar Disc Herniations. Spine. 44(1). 5–16. 16 indexed citations
9.
Ament, Jared D., Timothy Kim, Isabelle M. Germano, et al.. (2017). Planning and Executing the Neurosurgery Boot Camp: The Bolivia Experience. World Neurosurgery. 104. 407–410. 14 indexed citations
10.
Ament, Jared D., et al.. (2017). Cost-Effectiveness of Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma. World Neurosurgery. 110. e496–e503. 18 indexed citations
11.
Kim, Kee D. & Jared D. Ament. (2017). Spinal Cord Injury Treatment. Spine. 42(7). S21–S21. 4 indexed citations
12.
Ament, Jared D., et al.. (2016). Cost Utility Analysis of the Cervical Artificial Disc vs Fusion for the Treatment of 2-Level Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease. Neurosurgery. 79(1). 135–145. 30 indexed citations
13.
Ament, Jared D., et al.. (2015). A Novel Quality-of-Life Utility Index in Patients With Multilevel Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease. Spine. 40(14). 1072–1078. 11 indexed citations
14.
Ament, Jared D. & Kee D. Kim. (2012). Standardizing cost-utility analysis in neurosurgery. Neurosurgical FOCUS. 33(1). E4–E4. 16 indexed citations
15.
Rudnisky, Christopher J., Michael W. Belin, Amit Todani, et al.. (2012). Risk Factors for the Development of Retroprosthetic Membranes with Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1. Ophthalmology. 119(5). 951–955. 67 indexed citations
16.
Todani, Amit, Joseph B. Ciolino, Jared D. Ament, et al.. (2011). Titanium back plate for a PMMA keratoprosthesis: clinical outcomes. Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 249(10). 1515–1518. 78 indexed citations
17.
Czeiger, David, et al.. (2011). Transient Extremity Ischemia Augments CD34+ Progenitor Cell Availability. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 7(3). 639–645. 9 indexed citations
18.
Ament, Jared D., et al.. (2010). Cost effectiveness of the type II Boston keratoprosthesis. Eye. 25(3). 342–349. 7 indexed citations
19.
Ament, Jared D., Tomasz P. Stryjewski, Joseph B. Ciolino, et al.. (2009). Cost-Effectiveness of the Boston Keratoprosthesis. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 149(2). 221–228.e2. 40 indexed citations
20.
Ament, Jared D., Sandra Spurr-Michaud, Claes H. Dohlman, & Ilene K. Gipson. (2009). The Boston Keratoprosthesis: Comparing Corneal Epithelial Cell Compatibility with Titanium and PMMA. Cornea. 28(7). 808–811. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026