Jannik Haas

1.9k total citations
56 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Jannik Haas is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Energy Engineering and Power Technology and Water Science and Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jannik Haas has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 20 papers in Energy Engineering and Power Technology and 12 papers in Water Science and Technology. Recurrent topics in Jannik Haas's work include Integrated Energy Systems Optimization (21 papers), Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (19 papers) and Electric Power System Optimization (12 papers). Jannik Haas is often cited by papers focused on Integrated Energy Systems Optimization (21 papers), Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (19 papers) and Electric Power System Optimization (12 papers). Jannik Haas collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Chile and United States. Jannik Haas's co-authors include Wolfgang Nowak, Rodrigo Palma-­Behnke, Felix Cebulla, Claudia Rahmann, Pierluigi Mancarella, Willy Kracht, Ludger Eltrop, Tobias Junne, Joshua Eichman and Marcelo Olivares and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews and Journal of Cleaner Production.

In The Last Decade

Jannik Haas

52 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jannik Haas Germany 21 753 403 373 249 228 56 1.4k
Alexander Kies Germany 17 1.4k 1.9× 376 0.9× 665 1.8× 158 0.6× 300 1.3× 33 1.9k
Fausto A. Canales Colombia 16 781 1.0× 211 0.5× 490 1.3× 237 1.0× 243 1.1× 50 1.5k
Dimitris Al. Katsaprakakis Greece 22 548 0.7× 266 0.7× 405 1.1× 97 0.4× 346 1.5× 48 1.3k
Alexandre Beluco Brazil 15 779 1.0× 236 0.6× 511 1.4× 205 0.8× 257 1.1× 64 1.4k
Bruno Borba Brazil 18 716 1.0× 313 0.8× 113 0.3× 188 0.8× 135 0.6× 67 1.5k
Omar Farrok Bangladesh 20 780 1.0× 296 0.7× 234 0.6× 67 0.3× 218 1.0× 74 1.7k
Brian Tarroja United States 25 992 1.3× 205 0.5× 198 0.5× 409 1.6× 95 0.4× 48 1.6k
M. Kapsali Greece 15 604 0.8× 571 1.4× 312 0.8× 69 0.3× 243 1.1× 18 1.6k
Juha Kiviluoma Finland 26 2.1k 2.7× 546 1.4× 609 1.6× 71 0.3× 370 1.6× 98 2.8k
Franz Trieb Germany 24 619 0.8× 1.1k 2.7× 459 1.2× 260 1.0× 97 0.4× 106 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Jannik Haas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jannik Haas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jannik Haas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jannik Haas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jannik Haas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jannik Haas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jannik Haas. The network helps show where Jannik Haas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jannik Haas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jannik Haas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jannik Haas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jannik Haas. Jannik Haas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Osorio-Aravena, Juan Carlos, et al.. (2025). Insights for informing energy transition policies – Are decision makers listening to science? The case of Chile. Energy Strategy Reviews. 58. 101644–101644. 4 indexed citations
2.
Haas, Jannik, et al.. (2025). The role of hydrogen offtaker regulation in highly renewable electricity systems. Energy. 342. 139513–139513. 1 indexed citations
3.
Peer, Rebecca, et al.. (2025). Green hydrogen production potential in New Zealand cities: A bottom-up geospatial approach. Energy Conversion and Management. 348. 120773–120773.
4.
Haas, Jannik, et al.. (2025). Clean technology cost projections: investment and levelized costs of solar, wind, battery, and hydrogen. Scientific Data. 12(1). 1670–1670.
5.
Gulagi, Ashish, Dominik Keiner, Rasul Satymov, et al.. (2025). Analysing techno-economic impacts of integrating wave power to achieve carbon neutrality and electricity based fuel exports: A case for New Zealand. Energy. 319. 134878–134878. 2 indexed citations
6.
Moreno, Rodrigo, et al.. (2025). Can distributed hydrogen production improve the earthquake resilience of power systems?. Applied Energy. 403. 127069–127069.
7.
Palma-­Behnke, Rodrigo, et al.. (2024). Characterizing decision making under deep uncertainty for model-based energy transitions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 192. 114233–114233. 6 indexed citations
8.
Peer, Rebecca, et al.. (2024). How much hydrogen could we need in New Zealand? Understanding the diverse hydrogen applications and their regional mapping. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 55(4). 833–852. 4 indexed citations
9.
Peer, Rebecca, et al.. (2024). Understanding the Challenges for Modelling Islands’ Energy Systems and How to Solve Them. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports. 11(4). 95–104. 5 indexed citations
10.
Peer, Rebecca, et al.. (2024). Distributed hydrogen systems: A literature review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 85. 427–439. 14 indexed citations
11.
12.
Canessa, Rafaella, et al.. (2023). Electrolyzer cost projections compared to actual market costs: A Critical Analysis. 1–5. 3 indexed citations
13.
Galván-Gaméz, A., et al.. (2022). Exporting sunshine: Planning South America’s electricity transition with green hydrogen. Applied Energy. 325. 119569–119569. 32 indexed citations
14.
Osorio-Aravena, Juan Carlos, Jannik Haas, Arman Aghahosseini, & Christian Breyer. (2022). Commentary and critical discussion on ‘Decarbonizing the Chilean Electric Power System: A Prospective Analysis of Alternative Carbon Emissions Policies’. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 36. 11–18. 7 indexed citations
15.
Kern, Jordan D., et al.. (2021). Technology Pathways Could Help Drive the U.S. West Coast Grid's Exposure to Hydrometeorological Uncertainty. Earth s Future. 10(1). 16 indexed citations
16.
Olivares, Marcelo, et al.. (2021). Grid-wide assessment of varying re-regulation storage capacity for hydropeaking mitigation. Journal of Environmental Management. 293. 112866–112866. 3 indexed citations
17.
Cao, Karl‐Kiên, et al.. (2021). To Prevent or Promote Grid Expansion? Analyzing the Future Role of Power Transmission in the European Energy System. Frontiers in Energy Research. 8. 19 indexed citations
18.
Pérez‐Díaz, Juan I., et al.. (2019). Should environmental constraints be considered in linear programming based water value calculators?. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 117. 105662–105662. 6 indexed citations
19.
Haas, Jannik, Thomas Telsnig, Felipe A. Díaz-Alvarado, et al.. (2017). Towards solar power supply for copper production in Chile: Assessment of global warming potential using a life-cycle approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. 164. 242–249. 55 indexed citations
20.
Haas, Jannik, Rodrigo Palma-­Behnke, Felipe Valencia, et al.. (2017). Sunset or sunrise? Understanding the barriers and options for the massive deployment of solar technologies in Chile. Energy Policy. 112. 399–414. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026