Janneke Elberse

644 total citations
17 papers, 371 citations indexed

About

Janneke Elberse is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Janneke Elberse has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 371 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Janneke Elberse's work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers). Janneke Elberse is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers). Janneke Elberse collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Janneke Elberse's co-authors include Jacqueline E. W. Broerse, J.F. Caron-Flinterman, Tineke Abma, C.A.C.M. Pittens, Merel Visse, Jonas Dalege, Frenk van Harreveld, Maarten de Wit, Tjard de Cock Buning and Mattijs Lambooij and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and European Respiratory Journal.

In The Last Decade

Janneke Elberse

16 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janneke Elberse Netherlands 10 186 66 63 46 39 17 371
Alison K. Herrmann United States 9 337 1.8× 80 1.2× 30 0.5× 40 0.9× 40 1.0× 19 543
Yu‐Mei Schoenberger United States 11 125 0.7× 61 0.9× 51 0.8× 43 0.9× 75 1.9× 39 389
Todd Bear United States 11 95 0.5× 77 1.2× 139 2.2× 26 0.6× 43 1.1× 41 510
Nuria Romo Avilés Spain 13 151 0.8× 94 1.4× 117 1.9× 11 0.2× 62 1.6× 59 496
María Magdalena Alonso Castillo Mexico 11 228 1.2× 52 0.8× 41 0.7× 10 0.2× 34 0.9× 100 417
Melissa Filippi United States 13 193 1.0× 99 1.5× 77 1.2× 19 0.4× 61 1.6× 32 550
Lawrence Mróz Canada 12 159 0.9× 122 1.8× 128 2.0× 28 0.6× 18 0.5× 16 590
Erin Cameron Canada 12 120 0.6× 105 1.6× 46 0.7× 23 0.5× 12 0.3× 70 461
Susan M. Campbell United States 9 162 0.9× 72 1.1× 102 1.6× 24 0.5× 37 0.9× 14 469
Dorothy Szinay United Kingdom 9 183 1.0× 50 0.8× 52 0.8× 25 0.5× 28 0.7× 16 382

Countries citing papers authored by Janneke Elberse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janneke Elberse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janneke Elberse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janneke Elberse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janneke Elberse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janneke Elberse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janneke Elberse. The network helps show where Janneke Elberse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janneke Elberse

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janneke Elberse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janneke Elberse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janneke Elberse. Janneke Elberse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Elberse, Janneke, et al.. (2025). Make America quiet again: Achieving socially robust knowledge on noise pollution through citizen science. Public Understanding of Science. 34(8). 1066–1087.
2.
3.
Elberse, Janneke, et al.. (2023). Impacts of citizen science on trust between stakeholders and trust in science in a polarized context. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 25(6). 723–736. 5 indexed citations
4.
Boom, Wijnand van den, Elske Marra, Nina van der Vliet, et al.. (2023). General Mental Health, Loneliness, and Life Satisfaction in the Context of COVID-19 Policies: A 2-Year Cohort Study in the Netherlands, April 2020–January 2022. Public Health Reports. 138(5). 812–821. 5 indexed citations
5.
Boom, Wijnand van den, Mart van Dijk, Bianca E.P. Snijders, et al.. (2023). Cohort profile: The Corona Behavioral Unit cohort, a longitudinal mixed-methods study on COVID-19-related behavior, well-being and policy support in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE. 18(7). e0289294–e0289294. 10 indexed citations
6.
Dalege, Jonas, et al.. (2023). A tale of two cities: How a psychological network approach can improve our understanding of local residents’ risk perception of the process industries. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 85. 105169–105169. 1 indexed citations
7.
Harreveld, Frenk van, et al.. (2022). Understanding change in COVID-19 vaccination intention with network analysis of longitudinal data from Dutch adults. npj Vaccines. 7(1). 114–114. 13 indexed citations
8.
Boom, Wijnand van den, Elske Marra, Nina van der Vliet, et al.. (2022). Mental Health, Loneliness and Life Satisfaction in the Dynamic Context of Pandemic Policies and Healthcare Burden: A Two-Year Cohort Study in the Netherlands. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
9.
Dalege, Jonas, et al.. (2021). A Psychological Network Approach to Attitudes and Preventive Behaviors During Pandemics: A COVID-19 Study in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 13(1). 233–245. 31 indexed citations
10.
Spruijt, Pita, Mart van Dijk, Janneke Elberse, et al.. (2021). Understanding a national increase in COVID-19 vaccination intention, the Netherlands, November 2020–March 2021. Eurosurveillance. 26(36). 21 indexed citations
11.
Dobbels, Fabienne, Corina de Jong, Ellen Drost, et al.. (2014). The PROactive innovative conceptual framework on physical activity. European Respiratory Journal. 44(5). 1223–1233. 39 indexed citations
12.
Pittens, C.A.C.M., Janneke Elberse, Merel Visse, Tineke Abma, & Jacqueline E. W. Broerse. (2014). Research agendas involving patients: Factors that facilitate or impede translation of patients' perspectives in programming and implementation. Science and Public Policy. 41(6). 809–820. 22 indexed citations
13.
Abma, Tineke, C.A.C.M. Pittens, Merel Visse, Janneke Elberse, & Jacqueline E. W. Broerse. (2014). Patient involvement in research programming and implementation. Health Expectations. 18(6). 2449–2464. 47 indexed citations
14.
Wit, Maarten de, Janneke Elberse, Jacqueline E. W. Broerse, & Tineke Abma. (2013). Do not forget the professional – the value of the FIRST model for guiding the structural involvement of patients in rheumatology research. Health Expectations. 18(4). 489–503. 44 indexed citations
15.
Elberse, Janneke, C.A.C.M. Pittens, Tjard de Cock Buning, & Jacqueline E. W. Broerse. (2012). Patient involvement in a scientific advisory process: Setting the research agenda for medical products. Health Policy. 107(2-3). 231–242. 39 indexed citations
16.
Broerse, Jacqueline E. W., Janneke Elberse, J.F. Caron-Flinterman, & Marjolein Zweekhorst. (2010). Enhancing a transition towards a needs-oriented health research system through patient participation. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 181–205. 4 indexed citations
17.
Elberse, Janneke, J.F. Caron-Flinterman, & Jacqueline E. W. Broerse. (2010). Patient-expert partnerships in research: how to stimulate inclusion of patient perspectives. Health Expectations. 14(3). 225–239. 85 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alison K. Herrmann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yu‐Mei Schoenberger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Todd Bear Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nuria Romo Avilés Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by María Magdalena Alonso Castillo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Melissa Filippi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lawrence Mróz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Erin Cameron Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susan M. Campbell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dorothy Szinay
Rankless by CCL
2026