Janna Eaves-Rathert
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Automotive Engineering top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Cary L. PintMurtaza ZohairKathleen MoyerJason ValentineBridget R. RogersAnna DouglasJayanth R. RamamurthyShan Jiang
- Topics
- Advancements in Battery Materials (6 papers)Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (5 papers)Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Automotive EngineeringElectronic, Optical and Magnetic MaterialsElectrical and Electronic Engineering
- Journals
- Nano LettersACS NanoCarbon
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Janna Eaves-Rathert
9 papers receiving 350 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 245
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 87
- Automotive Engineering 71
- Materials Chemistry 70
- Biomedical Engineering 54
Countries citing papers authored by Janna Eaves-Rathert
This map shows the geographic impact of Janna Eaves-Rathert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janna Eaves-Rathert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janna Eaves-Rathert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janna Eaves-Rathert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janna Eaves-Rathert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janna Eaves-Rathert. The network helps show where Janna Eaves-Rathert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janna Eaves-Rathert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janna Eaves-Rathert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janna Eaves-Rathert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janna Eaves-Rathert. Janna Eaves-Rathert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 125 | |
| 7 | 59 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 73 |
About Janna Eaves-Rathert
Janna Eaves-Rathert is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 9 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advancements in Battery Materials (6 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (5 papers) and Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (71 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (87 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (245 citations). Janna Eaves-Rathert has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Cary L. Pint, Murtaza Zohair, Kathleen Moyer, Jason Valentine, Bridget R. Rogers, Anna Douglas, Jayanth R. Ramamurthy, Shan Jiang, Steve W. Martin and Shervin Alaei. Their work appears in journals such as Nano Letters, ACS Nano and Carbon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.