Janice Butt

1.3k total citations
32 papers, 938 citations indexed

About

Janice Butt is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Janice Butt has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 938 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 10 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Janice Butt's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (20 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (6 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (6 papers). Janice Butt is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (20 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (6 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (6 papers). Janice Butt collaborates with scholars based in Australia and Canada. Janice Butt's co-authors include Jennifer Fenwick, Yvonne Hauck, Jill Downie, Satvinder S. Dhaliwal, Virginia Schmied, Sara Bayes, Milan Dragović, Pamela Whittaker, Johanna C. Badcock and Dianne Bloxsome and has published in prestigious journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Journal of Clinical Nursing and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

In The Last Decade

Janice Butt

31 papers receiving 887 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janice Butt Australia 14 502 394 326 228 206 32 938
Claire Westdahl United States 10 397 0.8× 472 1.2× 366 1.1× 210 0.9× 212 1.0× 16 952
Karyn Kaufman Canada 13 489 1.0× 218 0.6× 422 1.3× 124 0.5× 101 0.5× 31 769
Lynda Rajan United Kingdom 14 213 0.4× 382 1.0× 188 0.6× 227 1.0× 209 1.0× 25 964
Sarah Beake United Kingdom 20 634 1.3× 556 1.4× 504 1.5× 578 2.5× 130 0.6× 39 1.4k
Mary Anne Biró Australia 21 863 1.7× 478 1.2× 645 2.0× 172 0.8× 264 1.3× 39 1.4k
Lucy Lewis Australia 16 599 1.2× 414 1.1× 423 1.3× 84 0.4× 102 0.5× 47 1.0k
Paul A. Buescher United States 19 286 0.6× 254 0.6× 435 1.3× 168 0.7× 123 0.6× 43 1.1k
Carrie Klima United States 14 370 0.7× 408 1.0× 472 1.4× 174 0.8× 110 0.5× 27 979
Sandra Campbell Australia 22 157 0.3× 259 0.7× 198 0.6× 117 0.5× 150 0.7× 66 1.0k
Sarah Verbiest United States 17 437 0.9× 642 1.6× 487 1.5× 123 0.5× 131 0.6× 59 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Janice Butt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Butt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Butt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Butt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Butt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Butt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Butt. The network helps show where Janice Butt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice Butt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice Butt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice Butt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice Butt. Janice Butt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bradfield, Zoe, et al.. (2021). Sexual and reproductive health education: Midwives’ confidence and practices. Women and Birth. 35(4). 360–366. 12 indexed citations
3.
Bayes, Sara, et al.. (2020). Midwifery leaders’ views on the factors considered crucial to implementing evidence-based practice in clinical areas. Women and Birth. 34(1). 22–29. 8 indexed citations
4.
Lewis, Lucy, et al.. (2018). Midwives’ experience of their education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 18(1). 249–249. 7 indexed citations
5.
Hauck, Yvonne, et al.. (2016). ‘Teaching on the Run’ with Australian midwives in a tertiary maternity hospital. Nurse Education in Practice. 22. 47–54. 10 indexed citations
6.
Butt, Janice, et al.. (2016). Maternity high-dependency care and the Australian midwife: A review of the literature. Women and Birth. 30(2). e73–e77. 3 indexed citations
7.
Hauck, Yvonne, Lucy Lewis, Lesley Kuliukas, Janice Butt, & Jennifer Wood. (2015). Graduate midwives' perception of their preparation and support in using evidence to advocate for women's choice: A Western Australian study. Nurse Education in Practice. 16(1). 305–311. 3 indexed citations
8.
Nicholls, Sarah, Yvonne Hauck, Sara Bayes, & Janice Butt. (2015). Exploring midwives’ perception of confidence around facilitating water birth in Western Australia: A qualitative descriptive study. Midwifery. 33. 73–81. 22 indexed citations
9.
Hauck, Yvonne, et al.. (2015). Midwives' experiences of working in a new service delivery model: the next birth after caesarean service. eSpace (Curtin University). 13(1). 10–14. 4 indexed citations
10.
Butt, Janice, et al.. (2015). Tanzanian midwives' perception of their professional role and implications for continuing professional development education. Nurse Education in Practice. 17. 116–122. 11 indexed citations
11.
Hauck, Yvonne, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of a next birth after caesarean antenatal clinic on women's birth intention and outcomes, knowledge, confidence, fear and perceptions of care. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 12(1). 11–15. 6 indexed citations
12.
Hauck, Yvonne, et al.. (2014). Australian midwives knowledge, attitude and perceived learning needs around perinatal mental health. Midwifery. 31(1). 247–255. 64 indexed citations
13.
Jennings, Belinda, et al.. (2010). Outreach obstetrics training in Western Australia improves neonatal outcome and decreases caesarean sections. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 30(1). 6–9. 11 indexed citations
14.
Fenwick, Jennifer, Janice Butt, Satvinder S. Dhaliwal, Yvonne Hauck, & Virginia Schmied. (2009). Western Australian women's perceptions of the style and quality of midwifery postnatal care in hospital and at home. Women and Birth. 23(1). 10–21. 85 indexed citations
16.
Fenwick, Jennifer, et al.. (2007). Providing perinatal loss care: Satisfying and dissatisfying aspects for midwives. Women and Birth. 20(4). 153–160. 41 indexed citations
17.
Wynaden, Dianne, et al.. (2006). The caregiving experience: How much do health professionals understand?. Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia. 13(3). 6–10. 23 indexed citations
18.
Fenwick, Jennifer, Janice Butt, Jill Downie, Leanne Monterosso, & Jennifer Wood. (2006). Priorities for midwifery research in Perth, Western Australia: A Delphi study. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 12(2). 78–93. 32 indexed citations
19.
Fenwick, Jennifer, Yvonne Hauck, Jill Downie, & Janice Butt. (2005). The childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Western Australian women. Midwifery. 21(1). 23–35. 114 indexed citations
20.
Butt, Janice, et al.. (1994). Sudden Death Following Cesarean Section for Placenta Previa and Accreta. American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology. 15(1). 32–35. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026