Janet Secrest
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 5%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Sandra P. ThomasRichard ZellerRichard A. RawsonChittur A. SivaramDouglas P. FineGeorge B. SelbyDonald E. Parker
- Topics
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers)Nursing education and management (4 papers)Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Janet Secrest
27 papers receiving 593 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- General Health Professions 186
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 135
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 133
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 94
- Rehabilitation 92
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Secrest
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Secrest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Secrest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Secrest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Secrest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Secrest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Secrest. The network helps show where Janet Secrest may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Secrest
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Secrest. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Secrest based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Secrest. Janet Secrest is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 61 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | 54 | |
| 15 | A comparison of endotracheal tube cuff pressures using estimation techniques and direct intracuff measurement. | 92 |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 87 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Janet Secrest
Janet Secrest is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 669 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (65 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (45 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (133 citations). Janet Secrest has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sandra P. Thomas, Richard Zeller, Richard A. Rawson, Chittur A. Sivaram, Douglas P. Fine, George B. Selby and Donald E. Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Journal of Nursing Scholarship.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.