Janet Ransley

778 total citations
42 papers, 479 citations indexed

About

Janet Ransley is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Ransley has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 479 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 15 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 11 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Janet Ransley's work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (11 papers) and Policing Practices and Perceptions (11 papers). Janet Ransley is often cited by papers focused on Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (11 papers) and Policing Practices and Perceptions (11 papers). Janet Ransley collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Slovenia and United Kingdom. Janet Ransley's co-authors include Lorraine Mazerolle, Tim Prenzler, Elena Marchetti, Patricia Ferguson, Gentry White, Melissa Bull, Matthew Manning, Richard Johnstone, Ross Hömel and Christine Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Aggression and Violent Behavior, Family Relations and Journal of Child and Family Studies.

In The Last Decade

Janet Ransley

39 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janet Ransley Australia 10 338 215 80 71 43 42 479
Andrés F. Rengifo United States 15 543 1.6× 221 1.0× 126 1.6× 110 1.5× 36 0.8× 34 610
Andrew L. Giacomazzi United States 11 563 1.7× 302 1.4× 93 1.2× 49 0.7× 21 0.5× 23 656
Julie Berg South Africa 10 283 0.8× 199 0.9× 45 0.6× 32 0.5× 12 0.3× 39 409
Karen Bullock United Kingdom 17 573 1.7× 397 1.8× 130 1.6× 107 1.5× 17 0.4× 77 739
Tapio Lappi‐Seppälä Slovenia 14 557 1.6× 109 0.5× 95 1.2× 147 2.1× 29 0.7× 36 640
John Ortiz Smykla United States 11 305 0.9× 204 0.9× 36 0.5× 85 1.2× 23 0.5× 30 395
Heike Goudriaan Netherlands 9 387 1.1× 181 0.8× 49 0.6× 45 0.6× 13 0.3× 12 474
Ronald Helms United States 11 469 1.4× 160 0.7× 101 1.3× 64 0.9× 9 0.2× 22 515
Kathleen J. Frydl United States 5 471 1.4× 352 1.6× 42 0.5× 38 0.5× 12 0.3× 6 550
Shea Cronin United States 12 254 0.8× 87 0.4× 44 0.6× 94 1.3× 20 0.5× 20 359

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Ransley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Ransley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Ransley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Ransley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Ransley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Ransley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Ransley. The network helps show where Janet Ransley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Ransley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Ransley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Ransley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Ransley. Janet Ransley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mazerolle, Lorraine, et al.. (2025). Partnerships in Policing. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 3 indexed citations
2.
McGee, Tara Renae, et al.. (2025). Supporting children of incarcerated mothers: The case for a system navigator. Family Relations. 74(5). 2738–2760.
3.
Ransley, Janet, et al.. (2024). A review of arguments for raising the age of criminal responsibility. Current Issues in Criminal Justice. 36(4). 369–385.
5.
McGee, Tara Renae, et al.. (2023). Supporting Children of Incarcerated Mothers: Creating Conditions for Integrated Social Service Delivery Using Scenario-Based Workshops. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 33(1). 1–13. 2 indexed citations
6.
Bates, Lyndel, et al.. (2023). Engaging non-policing partners to prevent or respond to crime. Policing & Society. 33(6). 717–731. 4 indexed citations
7.
Prenzler, Tim & Janet Ransley. (2023). Australia’s New National Anti-Corruption Commission: Background and Critique. Public Integrity. 26(5). 507–519. 1 indexed citations
8.
Sapkota, Diksha, Susan Dennison, Jyai Allen, et al.. (2022). Navigating pregnancy and early motherhood in prison: a thematic analysis of mothers’ experiences. Health & Justice. 10(1). 32–32. 13 indexed citations
9.
Porter, Louise, et al.. (2020). An environmental approach to police misconduct: exploring situational prevention possibilities to understanding and preventing police misconduct. Policing An International Journal. 43(6). 893–916. 3 indexed citations
10.
Manning, Matthew, Gabriel T. W. Wong, Janet Ransley, & Christine Smith. (2016). Analysing pseudoephedrine/methamphetamine policy options in Australia using multi-criteria decision modelling. International Journal of Drug Policy. 32. 85–92. 5 indexed citations
11.
Marchetti, Elena & Janet Ransley. (2014). Applying the critical lens to judicial officers and legal practitioners involved in sentencing indigenous offenders: Will anyone or anything do?. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 37(1). 1–33. 5 indexed citations
12.
Manning, Matthew, et al.. (2013). Policing methamphetamine problems: a framework for synthesising expert opinion and evaluating alternative policy options. Journal of Public Policy. 33(3). 371–396. 8 indexed citations
13.
Mazerolle, Lorraine & Janet Ransley. (2012). Crime, Place, and Pollution. Criminology & Public Policy. 11(2). 335–344. 8 indexed citations
14.
Bull, Melissa, et al.. (2012). Sickness in the System of Long-term Immigration Detention. Journal of Refugee Studies. 26(1). 47–68. 19 indexed citations
15.
Ransley, Janet & Elena Marchetti. (2008). Justice talk: Legal processes and conflicting perceptions of justice about a Palm Island death in custody. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 12(2). 41–53. 4 indexed citations
16.
Ransley, Janet, et al.. (2007). Police Education and the University Sector: Contrasting Models from the Australian Experience. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 18(1). 106–122. 49 indexed citations
17.
Ransley, Janet, et al.. (2007). Civil Litigation Against Police in Australia: Exploring Its Extent, Nature and Implications for Accountability. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 40(2). 143–160. 15 indexed citations
18.
Smallbone, Stephen & Janet Ransley. (2005). Legal and Psychological Controversies in the Preventive Incapacitation of Sexual Offenders. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 28(1). 299–305. 4 indexed citations
19.
Mazerolle, Lorraine & Janet Ransley. (2004). Third Party Policing: Prospects, Challenges and Implications for Regulators. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 57. 61–76. 5 indexed citations
20.
Ransley, Janet & Elena Marchetti. (2001). The hidden whiteness of Australian law: a case study. Griffith Law Review. 10(1). 139–152. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026