Janet Moore

2.1k total citations
20 papers, 232 citations indexed

About

Janet Moore is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Moore has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 232 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Law. Recurrent topics in Janet Moore's work include Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (5 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (4 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (3 papers). Janet Moore is often cited by papers focused on Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (5 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (4 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (3 papers). Janet Moore collaborates with scholars based in United States, Latvia and United Kingdom. Janet Moore's co-authors include Michael H. Fulton, Andrew G. Davies, Stephen M. Kengyelics, Brian Thompson, Arnold R. Cowen, Marie E. DeLorenzo, Miguel Uyaguari, Geoffrey I. Scott, Mohan U. Sivananthan and George P. Cobb and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Electrophoresis and European Radiology.

In The Last Decade

Janet Moore

19 papers receiving 220 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janet Moore United States 7 48 42 30 24 24 20 232
Hashim Olalekan Bakare South Korea 4 23 0.5× 19 0.5× 37 1.2× 15 0.6× 67 2.8× 5 257
А. В. Панов Russia 10 11 0.2× 25 0.6× 14 0.5× 10 0.4× 9 0.4× 79 570
Bjørn Hilt Norway 16 28 0.6× 22 0.5× 19 0.6× 258 10.8× 4 0.2× 47 628
Otakuye Conroy‐Ben United States 10 122 2.5× 8 0.2× 50 1.7× 159 6.6× 39 1.6× 25 436
David De Ridder Switzerland 11 83 1.7× 7 0.2× 14 0.5× 57 2.4× 35 1.5× 26 310
Dan Huang China 10 33 0.7× 23 0.5× 15 0.5× 19 0.8× 8 0.3× 54 364
Tatiana Silva Brazil 8 13 0.3× 5 0.1× 18 0.6× 20 0.8× 56 2.3× 29 332
Xiao Tan China 10 129 2.7× 16 0.4× 26 0.9× 88 3.7× 4 0.2× 22 351
Eun-Ha Cho South Korea 8 21 0.4× 20 0.5× 13 0.4× 22 0.9× 51 2.1× 24 320
Ian Farr United Kingdom 8 30 0.6× 10 0.2× 3 0.1× 34 1.4× 46 1.9× 20 381

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Moore. The network helps show where Janet Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Moore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Moore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Moore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Moore. Janet Moore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ruhland, Ebony, et al.. (2023). Positionality, intersectionality, power dynamics in community participatory research to define public safety in Black communities. Journal of Community Psychology. 51(7). 2845–2860. 5 indexed citations
2.
Ruhland, Ebony, et al.. (2021). Participatory Research, Community Perspectives, and Possibilities for Transformation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
3.
Moore, Janet, et al.. (2019). Attorney–Client Communication in Public Defense: A Qualitative Examination. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 31(6). 908–938. 10 indexed citations
4.
Moore, Janet, et al.. (2018). Privileging Public Defense Research. eYLS (Yale Law School). 69. 771. 2 indexed citations
5.
Moore, Janet. (2018). Isonomy, Austerity, and the Right to Choose Counsel. Indiana Law Review. 51(1). 167–209. 3 indexed citations
6.
Davies, Andrew & Janet Moore. (2017). Critical Issues and New Empirical Research in Public Defense: An Introduction. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University). 1 indexed citations
7.
Scott, Geoffrey I., Dwayne E. Porter, R. Sean Norman, et al.. (2016). Antibiotics as CECs: An Overview of the Hazards Posed by Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance. Frontiers in Marine Science. 3. 60 indexed citations
8.
Moore, Janet, et al.. (2015). Make Them Hear You: Participatory Defense and the Struggle for Criminal Justice Reform. Albany law review. 78(3). 1281. 2 indexed citations
9.
Campbell, Christopher M., et al.. (2015). Unnoticed, Untapped, and Underappreciated: Clients' Perceptions of their Public Defenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 33(6). 751–770. 14 indexed citations
10.
Moore, Janet. (2014). Democracy Enhancement in Criminal Law and Procedure. Utah law review. 2014(5). 1 indexed citations
11.
Cowen, Arnold R., et al.. (2014). Does the use of additional X-ray beam filtration during cine acquisition reduce clinical image quality and effective dose in cardiac interventional imaging?. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 162(4). 597–604. 3 indexed citations
12.
Moore, Janet. (2012). G Forces: Gideon v. Wainwright and Matthew Adler's Move Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis. Seattle journal for social justice. 11(3). 9.
13.
Moore, Janet. (2011). Democracy and Criminal Discovery Reform After Connick and Garcetti. Electrophoresis. 28(15). 1–37. 1 indexed citations
14.
DeLorenzo, Marie E., et al.. (2011). A long-term monitoring study of chlorophyll, microbial contaminants, and pesticides in a coastal residential stormwater pond and its adjacent tidal creek. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 184(1). 343–359. 48 indexed citations
15.
Uyaguari, Miguel, Peter B. Key, Janet Moore, Kirby L. Jackson, & Geoffrey I. Scott. (2009). Acute effects of the antibiotic oxytetracycline on the bacterial community of the grass shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 28(12). 2715–2724. 16 indexed citations
16.
Davies, Andrew G., Arnold R. Cowen, Stephen M. Kengyelics, Janet Moore, & Mohan U. Sivananthan. (2007). Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality. European Radiology. 17(7). 1913–1913. 1 indexed citations
17.
Davies, Andrew G., Arnold R. Cowen, Stephen M. Kengyelics, Janet Moore, & Mohan U. Sivananthan. (2006). Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality. European Radiology. 17(7). 1787–1794. 28 indexed citations
18.
Davies, Andrew G., Arnold R. Cowen, Stephen M. Kengyelics, et al.. (2006). X‐Ray Dose Reduction in Fluoroscopically Guided Electrophysiology Procedures. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 29(3). 262–271. 27 indexed citations
19.
Webber, Richard L., et al.. (2002). Hand-held three-dimensional dental X-ray system: technical description and preliminary results.. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 31(4). 240–248. 3 indexed citations
20.
Moore, Janet & Richard Walsh. (1966). Market structure of the agricultural industries.. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026