Jane Woolcock

3.1k total citations
9 papers, 165 citations indexed

About

Jane Woolcock is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Immunology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Woolcock has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 165 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 3 papers in Immunology. Recurrent topics in Jane Woolcock's work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers). Jane Woolcock is often cited by papers focused on Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers). Jane Woolcock collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Jane Woolcock's co-authors include Michael S. Broder, Ian S. Fraser, Malcolm G. Munro, Hilary Critchley, Peter T. Macklem, James C. Hogg, Annemarie Hennessy, Angela Makris, Robert Ogle and Charlene Thornton and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Applied Physiology and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

Jane Woolcock

9 papers receiving 151 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jane Woolcock Australia	5	93	51	48	30	25	9	165
Kugajeevan Vigneswaran United Kingdom	4	41 0.4×	49 1.0×	44 0.9×	15 0.5×	8 0.3×	8	151
Lisi Cai China	5	38 0.4×	102 2.0×	18 0.4×	4 0.1×	13 0.5×	7	163
Odysseas Gregoriou Greece	8	101 1.1×	221 4.3×	45 0.9×	5 0.2×	7 0.3×	15	313
Steven G. Kaali Hungary	12	28 0.3×	191 3.7×	122 2.5×	23 0.8×	5 0.2×	26	296
Cathryn James United Kingdom	7	76 0.8×	217 4.3×	29 0.6×	5 0.2×	4 0.2×	9	274
Robert M. Rosen United States	4	24 0.3×	27 0.5×	25 0.5×	7 0.2×	3 0.1×	4	66
Sivan Farladansky‐Gershnabel Israel	7	52 0.6×	8 0.2×	34 0.7×	3 0.1×	12 0.5×	24	116
Adriana C. H. Neven Australia	6	45 0.5×	132 2.6×	26 0.5×	2 0.1×	8 0.3×	9	203
Arash Mohazzab Iran	8	32 0.3×	140 2.7×	12 0.3×	9 0.3×	3 0.1×	30	192
Ioanna Kosteria Greece	9	10 0.1×	41 0.8×	59 1.2×	4 0.1×	9 0.4×	19	225

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Woolcock

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Woolcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Woolcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Woolcock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Woolcock

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Woolcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Woolcock. The network helps show where Jane Woolcock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Woolcock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Woolcock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Woolcock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Woolcock. Jane Woolcock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Lo, Glen, et al.. (2020). Lipiodol flush under ultrasound guidance in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 60(6). 965–969. 4 indexed citations

2.

Woolcock, Jane, Rosalie M Grivell, & Jodie M Dodd. (2017). Regimens of ultrasound surveillance for twin pregnancies for improving outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(11). CD011371–CD011371. 6 indexed citations

3.

Woolcock, Jane, Rosalie M Grivell, & Jodie M Dodd. (2014). Regimens of ultrasound surveillance for twin pregnancies for improving outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1 indexed citations

4.

Woolcock, Jane & Rosalie M Grivell. (2014). Noninvasive prenatal testing.. PubMed. 43(7). 432–4. 6 indexed citations

5.

Makris, Angela, Peter M. Farrell, Scott Heffernan, et al.. (2012). OS061. Placental growth factor reduces blood pressure and proteinuria in experimental preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertension. 2(3). 210–210. 3 indexed citations

6.

Woolcock, Jane, Hilary Critchley, Malcolm G. Munro, Michael S. Broder, & Ian S. Fraser. (2008). Review of the confusion in current and historical terminology and definitions for disturbances of menstrual bleeding. Fertility and Sterility. 90(6). 2269–2280. 59 indexed citations

7.

Woolcock, Jane, Annemarie Hennessy, Bei Xu, et al.. (2008). Soluble Flt‐1 as a diagnostic marker of pre‐eclampsia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 48(1). 64–70. 42 indexed citations

8.

Woolcock, Jane, Annemarie Hennessy, Charlene Thornton, et al.. (2008). Soluble Flt-1 as a Diagnostic Marker of Preeclampsia. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 28(3). 160–160. 2 indexed citations

9.

Woolcock, Jane, et al.. (1969). Influence of autonomic nervous system on airway resistance and elastic recoil. Journal of Applied Physiology. 26(6). 814–818. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact