Jane Williams

991 total citations
67 papers, 617 citations indexed

About

Jane Williams is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Williams has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 617 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in General Health Professions, 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Jane Williams's work include Manufacturing Process and Optimization (8 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (7 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (6 papers). Jane Williams is often cited by papers focused on Manufacturing Process and Optimization (8 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (7 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (6 papers). Jane Williams collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Jane Williams's co-authors include Stacy M. Carter, Chris Degeling, Angela Dawson, Patti Shih, Lucie Rychetnik, Julie Mooney‐Somers, Chris McMahon, Christopher Mayes, Wendy Lipworth and Lisa Parker and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and BMJ.

In The Last Decade

Jane Williams

60 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Williams Australia 15 140 106 102 91 64 67 617
Laurie Anne Ferguson United States 10 251 1.8× 88 0.8× 175 1.7× 48 0.5× 60 0.9× 24 777
Yoonhee P. Ha United States 12 284 2.0× 86 0.8× 106 1.0× 155 1.7× 63 1.0× 22 819
Diana Gosálvez Prados Spain 13 194 1.4× 86 0.8× 153 1.5× 55 0.6× 31 0.5× 59 693
Maria Kletečka-Pulker Austria 13 117 0.8× 125 1.2× 97 1.0× 135 1.5× 24 0.4× 51 725
Sudip Bhattacharya India 14 125 0.9× 175 1.7× 77 0.8× 36 0.4× 29 0.5× 89 725
Gaurav Dave United States 16 323 2.3× 78 0.7× 203 2.0× 65 0.7× 26 0.4× 78 804
John Woods Australia 14 125 0.9× 82 0.8× 116 1.1× 52 0.6× 19 0.3× 82 705
Wadi B. Alonazi Saudi Arabia 15 199 1.4× 55 0.5× 96 0.9× 33 0.4× 57 0.9× 71 674
Mahnaz Samadbeik Iran 16 269 1.9× 97 0.9× 142 1.4× 55 0.6× 32 0.5× 65 831
Margreet Duetz Switzerland 6 151 1.1× 113 1.1× 94 0.9× 47 0.5× 15 0.2× 7 629

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Williams. The network helps show where Jane Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Williams. Jane Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Newson, Ainsley J., Jane Williams, Giuliana Fuscaldo, et al.. (2025). Public funding for mitochondrial donation: An Australian public deliberation. BMC Medical Ethics. 26(1). 131–131.
2.
Degeling, Chris, et al.. (2024). Reconciling market and moral logics on a minimum wage: Supermarket work in Australia during the first two years of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6. 100495–100495. 1 indexed citations
3.
Williams, Jane, et al.. (2024). Vigilance in infectious disease emergencies: Expanding the concept. Social Science & Medicine. 344. 116648–116648. 2 indexed citations
5.
Degeling, Chris, et al.. (2023). The dilemmas of antimicrobial stewardship in aged care: The perspectives of the family members of older Australians. Geriatric Nursing. 50. 117–123. 6 indexed citations
6.
Degeling, Chris, Jane Williams, Gwendolyn L. Gilbert, & Jane Johnson. (2023). Why ethical frameworks fail to deliver in a pandemic: Are proposed alternatives an improvement?. Bioethics. 37(8). 806–813. 6 indexed citations
7.
Williams, Jane, Neil Howlett, Gillian W. Shorter, Julia K. Zakrzewski-Fruer, & Angel Chater. (2023). What roles does physical activity play following the death of a parent as a young person? A qualitative investigation. BMC Public Health. 23(1). 210–210. 3 indexed citations
8.
Williams, Jane, Claire Hooker, Gwendolyn L. Gilbert, Su-yin Hor, & Chris Degeling. (2023). Disagreement among experts about public health decision making: is it polarisation and does it matter?. BMJ Global Health. 8(3). e011182–e011182. 7 indexed citations
9.
Haire, Bridget, Gwendolyn L. Gilbert, John Kaldor, et al.. (2022). Experiences of risk in Australian hotel quarantine: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 22(1). 953–953. 10 indexed citations
10.
Williams, Jane, Chris Degeling, Jodie McVernon, & Angela Dawson. (2021). How should we conduct pandemic vaccination?. Vaccine. 39(6). 994–999. 22 indexed citations
11.
Williams, Jane, Gwendolyn L. Gilbert, Angela Dawson, et al.. (2021). Uncertainty and agency in COVID-19 hotel quarantine in Australia. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 100034–100034. 8 indexed citations
12.
Degeling, Chris, Jane Williams, Stacy M. Carter, et al.. (2020). Priority allocation of pandemic influenza vaccines in Australia – Recommendations of 3 community juries. Vaccine. 39(2). 255–262. 12 indexed citations
13.
Chater, Angel, Jane Williams, & Molly Courtenay. (2019). The prescribing needs of community practitioner nurse prescribers: A qualitative investigation using the theoretical domains framework and COM‐B. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 75(11). 2952–2968. 19 indexed citations
14.
McDonald, Sally, Alice Fabbri, Lisa Parker, Jane Williams, & Lisa Bero. (2019). Medical donations are not always free: an assessment of compliance of medicine and medical device donations with World Health Organization guidelines (2009–2017). International Health. 11(5). 379–402. 22 indexed citations
15.
Williams, Jane, Christopher Mayes, Paul A. Komesaroff, Ian Kerridge, & Wendy Lipworth. (2017). Conflicts of interest in medicine: taking diversity seriously. Internal Medicine Journal. 47(7). 739–746. 10 indexed citations
16.
Carter, Stacy M., Jane Williams, Lisa Parker, et al.. (2015). Screening for Cervical, Prostate, and Breast Cancer. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 49(2). 274–285. 24 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Laura‐Jane, Deborah Gill, Chris Cooper, et al.. (2014). Successful collaboration in education: the UMeP. The Clinical Teacher. 11(7). 546–550. 4 indexed citations
18.
Williams, Jane, et al.. (2013). The use of reflective practice to support mentoring of elite equestrian coaches. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6 indexed citations
19.
McMahon, Catherine, et al.. (1994). A Formal Language for the Design of Manufacturable Objects. Explore Bristol Research. 135–155. 3 indexed citations
20.
Williams, Jane. (1993). Videodisc and compact disc technologies. Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine. 16(2). 85–87. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026