Jane V. Appleton

82 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jane V. Appleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Research and Theory 49
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 47
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 27
  • General Health Professions 519
  • Clinical Psychology 404
Replace Megan‐Jane Johnstone with:
Megan‐Jane Johnstone Australia
Michela Rimondini Italy
Carole Orchard Canada
Maura Galletta Italy
Christine Furber United Kingdom
Barbro Wadensten Sweden
Marilyn McFarland United States
Abbey Hyde Ireland
Aysegul Gozu United States
V. Susan Dahinten Canada
Jane V. Appleton relative to Megan‐Jane Johnstone Australia Megan‐Jane Johnstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Megan‐Jane Johnstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane V. Appleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane V. Appleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane V. Appleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane V. Appleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane V. Appleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane V. Appleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane V. Appleton. The network helps show where Jane V. Appleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane V. Appleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane V. Appleton Line = papers co-authored together Jane V. Appleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995196
2 200282
3 199782
4 200071
5 199764
6 201751
7 200645
8 201633
9 199631
10 201231
11 202130
12 201728
13 201127
14 200726
15 200425
16 199724
17 201922
18 201221
19 199420
20 200819

About Jane V. Appleton

Jane V. Appleton is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (38 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (18 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (15 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (9 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (9 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (8 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (8 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (49 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (47 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (27 citations), General Health Professions (519 citations) and Clinical Psychology (404 citations). Jane V. Appleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lindy King, Sarah Cowley, Debra Jackson, Catherine Powell, Catherine Henshall, Lindsey Coombes, Eija Paavilainen, Peter Sidebotham, Caroline Bradbury‐Jones and Debby Allen. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse Review, Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Health & Social Care in the Community and Journal of research in nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact