Jane O’Connell

562 citations
16 papers · 373 indexed · h-index 10

Jane O’Connell

16 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Jane O’Connell
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 36
  • Emergency Medicine 149
  • General Health Professions 294
  • Emergency Medical Services 78
  • Health Information Management 33
Replace Natasha Jennings with:
Natasha Jennings Australia
Mark McClelland United States
Grainne Lowe Australia
Karima Velji Canada
Mieke van der Biezen Netherlands
Monica O’Reilly-Jacob United States
Enid Hirst United Kingdom
Laurie Zone-Smith United States
Birgitte Graverholt Norway
Tracy Yee United States
Jane O’Connell relative to Natasha Jennings Australia Natasha Jennings's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Natasha Jennings · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane O’Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane O’Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane O’Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane O’Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane O’Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane O’Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane O’Connell. The network helps show where Jane O’Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Jane O’Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane O’Connell Line = papers co-authored together Jane O’Connell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 20244
2 20171
3 201710
4 201716
5 201612
6
Diagnostic accuracy of risk stratification tools for patients with chest pain in the rural emergency department: A systematic review
20161
7
Profiling emergency nurse practitioner service
20141
8 2014162
9 201414
10 20142
11 201372
12 201228
13 20121
14 201020
15 200711
16 200718

About Jane O’Connell

Jane O’Connell is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and General Health Professions, having authored 16 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Roles and Practices (12 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (9 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (36 citations), Emergency Medicine (149 citations) and General Health Professions (294 citations). Jane O’Connell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, India and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Glenn Gardner, Stuart Clifford, Natasha Jennings, Amanda Fox, Anne Gardner, Sandy Middleton, Fiona Coyer, Sharon Hillege, Rose McMaster and Dianne Crellin. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Emergency Medicine Australasia, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026