Jane O. Schell

2.8k citations
82 papers · 1.9k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Jane O. Schell

74 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Jane O. Schell
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Nephrology 503
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 579
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 42
  • Transplantation 32
  • General Health Professions 99
Replace Helen Tam‐Tham with:
Helen Tam‐Tham Canada
Maoliosa Donald Canada
Azhar M Farooqi United Kingdom
Susan H. Finkelstein United States
Jacques Lemelin Canada
Sueli Marques Brazil
Roberto E. Izquierdo United States
Conrad M. Harris United Kingdom
Garrett K. Chan United States
Marianne Saragosa Canada
Jane O. Schell relative to Helen Tam‐Tham Canada Helen Tam‐Tham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.6×
Helen Tam‐Tham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane O. Schell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane O. Schell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane O. Schell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane O. Schell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane O. Schell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane O. Schell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane O. Schell. The network helps show where Jane O. Schell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane O. Schell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane O. Schell Line = papers co-authored together Jane O. Schell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012206
2 2016171
3 2012108
4 201692
5 201673
6 201972
7 201666
8 201965
9 201763
10 201960
11 201258
12 201657
13 201756
14 201853
15 201452
16 202450
17 201748
18 201734
19 201532
20 201628

About Jane O. Schell

Jane O. Schell is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nephrology, General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Transplantation, having authored 82 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (44 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (10 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (1 paper), Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (1 paper), Cultural Competency in Health Care (1 paper) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (503 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (579 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (42 citations), Transplantation (32 citations) and General Health Professions (99 citations). Jane O. Schell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert M. Arnold, James A. Tulsky, Holly M. Koncicki, Karen E. Steinhauser, Natalie Ammarell, Uptal D. Patel, Jamie A. Green, Mark L. Unruh, Jennifer S. Scherer and Julie Wilson Childers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Seminars in Dialysis and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact