Jane Denton

425 total citations
29 papers, 279 citations indexed

About

Jane Denton is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Denton has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 279 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 5 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Jane Denton's work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (11 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (4 papers). Jane Denton is often cited by papers focused on Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (11 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (4 papers). Jane Denton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Jane Denton's co-authors include Brenda Leese, C. J. Edmonds, M. H. Rogers, Atul Singhal, Alan Lucas, Julie Lanigan, Elizabeth Isaacs, Paul Gringras, Merryl Harvey and Anthony E. Bourgeois and has published in prestigious journals such as PEDIATRICS, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and PLoS Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Jane Denton

26 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Denton United Kingdom 10 161 62 62 48 45 29 279
A. Cook United Kingdom 7 103 0.6× 46 0.7× 161 2.6× 212 4.4× 56 1.2× 7 443
Sônia Maria Motta Palma Brazil 8 143 0.9× 127 2.0× 108 1.7× 14 0.3× 7 0.2× 21 313
P. Sarkar United Kingdom 7 207 1.3× 60 1.0× 224 3.6× 14 0.3× 12 0.3× 7 399
Albert Franco United States 8 173 1.1× 122 2.0× 259 4.2× 57 1.2× 12 0.3× 11 444
P. Sinha United Kingdom 11 121 0.8× 82 1.3× 105 1.7× 22 0.5× 32 0.7× 26 306
Emma Bränn Sweden 13 107 0.7× 107 1.7× 371 6.0× 38 0.8× 37 0.8× 27 505
John Kelly United Kingdom 8 170 1.1× 55 0.9× 59 1.0× 32 0.7× 6 0.1× 14 443
Yvonne O’Brien Ireland 12 122 0.8× 89 1.4× 137 2.2× 28 0.6× 117 2.6× 23 337
A S Khashan Ireland 6 229 1.4× 210 3.4× 207 3.3× 39 0.8× 8 0.2× 8 493
Mohamed Adel El-Hadidy Egypt 9 40 0.2× 23 0.4× 99 1.6× 25 0.5× 30 0.7× 27 307

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Denton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Denton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Denton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Denton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Denton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Denton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Denton. The network helps show where Jane Denton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Denton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Denton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Denton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Denton. Jane Denton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Murray, Sarah R., Manuela Deidda, Kathleen Boyd, et al.. (2024). Randomised placebo-controlled trial of antenatal corticosteroids for planned birth in twins (STOPPIT-3): study protocol. BMJ Open. 14(1). e078778–e078778. 1 indexed citations
2.
Norman, Jane E., John Norrie, Graeme MacLennan, et al.. (2022). The Arabin Pessary to Prevent Preterm Birth in Women With a Twin Pregnancy and a Short Cervix: The STOPPIT 2 RCT. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 77(1). 1–3. 2 indexed citations
3.
Norman, Jane E., John Norrie, Graeme MacLennan, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of the Arabin cervical pessary for prevention of preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy and short cervix (STOPPIT-2): An open-label randomised trial and updated meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine. 18(3). e1003506–e1003506. 25 indexed citations
4.
Norman, Jane E., John Norrie, Graeme MacLennan, et al.. (2021). The Arabin pessary to prevent preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy and a short cervix: the STOPPIT 2 RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 25(44). 1–66. 4 indexed citations
5.
Yelland, Lisa N, Katrina J. Scurrah, Paulo H. Ferreira, et al.. (2021). Conducting Clinical Trials in Twin Populations: A Review of Design, Analysis, Recruitment and Ethical Issues for Twin-Only Trials. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 24(6). 359–364. 3 indexed citations
6.
Prior, Thomas W., et al.. (2019). The impact of cross-border IVF on maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiple pregnancies: Experience from a UK fetal medicine service. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 238. 63–67. 4 indexed citations
7.
Norman, Jane E., John Norrie, Graeme MacLennan, et al.. (2018). Open randomised trial of the (Arabin) pessary to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancy with health economics and acceptability: STOPPIT-2—a study protocol. BMJ Open. 8(12). e026430–e026430. 11 indexed citations
8.
Denton, Jane, et al.. (2018). One too many?: Families with multiple births. 91(10). 28–31. 5 indexed citations
9.
Leese, Brenda, Julie Jomeen, & Jane Denton. (2012). Appropriate maternal weight gain in singleton and twin pregnancies: what is the evidence?. Human Fertility. 15(4). 194–199. 11 indexed citations
10.
Denton, Jane, et al.. (2011). Toward developing a training pathway for fertility nurses: report of the 2010 training and educational survey. Human Fertility. 14(3). 167–178. 6 indexed citations
11.
Leese, Brenda & Jane Denton. (2010). Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review. Human Fertility. 13(1). 28–34. 32 indexed citations
12.
Denton, Jane, et al.. (2006). Preparation for parenting multiple birth children. Early Human Development. 82(6). 371–378. 34 indexed citations
13.
Denton, Jane. (2005). Twins and more--1. Some current thinking on multiple births.. PubMed. 15(5). 143–6. 1 indexed citations
14.
Denton, Jane. (2005). Twins and more--2. Practical aspects of parenting in the early years.. PubMed. 15(6). 173–6. 9 indexed citations
15.
Denton, Jane, et al.. (2001). Helping Helpers to Help - Guidelines for Professionals Working with Multiple Birth Families. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 4(3). 184. 1 indexed citations
16.
Bryan, Elizabeth & Jane Denton. (2001). Reproductive Health Care Policies Around the World: The Work of the Multiple Births Foundation. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 18(1). 8–10. 3 indexed citations
17.
Denton, Jane. (1997). Inheriting an ethical dilemma. Nursing Standard. 11(29). 22–23. 1 indexed citations
18.
Bryan, Elizabeth & Jane Denton. (1994). Triplets and higher order births: too high a price?. British Journal of Midwifery. 2(4). 151–153. 1 indexed citations
19.
Denton, Jane. (1990). Infertility and legislation. Nursing Standard. 5(6). 56–56. 1 indexed citations
20.
Bourgeois, Anthony E., et al.. (1974). Multidimensional Locus of Control and Voluntary Control of GSR. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 39(3). 1142–1142. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026