Jane de Lemos

18 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers

Jane de Lemos
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 84
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 73
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 49
  • Internal Medicine 31
  • Developmental Neuroscience 27
Replace Benjamin Hohlfelder with:
Benjamin Hohlfelder United States
Mary Beth Bobek United States
Codjo D. Djade Italy
Earnest Alexander United States
Allan Shustack Canada
Mahmoud Ammar United States
Chris Thorpe United Kingdom
Maria C. Pruchnicki United States
Sarah Welch United States
Doreen Yee Canada
Jane de Lemos relative to Benjamin Hohlfelder United States Benjamin Hohlfelder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Benjamin Hohlfelder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane de Lemos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane de Lemos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane de Lemos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane de Lemos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane de Lemos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane de Lemos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane de Lemos. The network helps show where Jane de Lemos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane de Lemos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane de Lemos Line = papers co-authored together Jane de Lemos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200076
2 200737
3 201032
4 199921
5 201817
6 201115
7 201913
8 20139
9 20108
10 20216
11 20125
12 20103
13 20153
14 20092
15 19992
16 20202
17 20091
18 20051
19 20240

About Jane de Lemos

Jane de Lemos is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Surgery, having authored 19 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (2 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (84 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (73 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (49 citations), Internal Medicine (31 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (27 citations). Jane de Lemos has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Spain and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Dean R. Chittock, Martin Tweeddale, Peter Loewen, Teresa Lee, Stephen Ho, Sean K Gorman, Richard S Slavik, Richard K. Simons, Peter Wing and Roxane Carr. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews, Canadian Journal of Diabetes, Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine and Pharmacy Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact