Jane Campbell

588 total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 338 citations indexed

About

Jane Campbell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Campbell has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 338 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Jane Campbell's work include Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers) and Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (1 paper). Jane Campbell is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers) and Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (1 paper). Jane Campbell collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Jane Campbell's co-authors include Ling Xu, K Diallo, Michelle McIsaac, Tana Wuliji, Senthurun Mylvaganam, N. Bellamy, Jennifer Flynn, Janet Pope, Joyce Rasin and Catherine Moore and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, Nursing Outlook and Clinical Otolaryngology.

In The Last Decade

Jane Campbell

8 papers receiving 320 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Gender equity in the health workforce: analysis of 104 countries

2019 256 citations Michelle McIsaac, Ling Xu et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jane Campbell United States	6	122	62	49	48	48	8	338
Erin Cameron Canada	12	120 1.0×	26 0.4×	93 1.9×	46 1.0×	105 2.2×	70	461
P. Makara Hungary	9	144 1.2×	69 1.1×	25 0.5×	46 1.0×	84 1.8×	16	324
Joanna Veazey Brooks United States	10	131 1.1×	46 0.7×	25 0.5×	36 0.8×	152 3.2×	56	403
W. Michael Byrd United States	10	151 1.2×	40 0.6×	60 1.2×	104 2.2×	74 1.5×	14	339
George Dantas de Azevedo Brazil	14	242 2.0×	35 0.6×	24 0.5×	47 1.0×	117 2.4×	58	491
Elizabeth Hinton United States	5	118 1.0×	34 0.5×	60 1.2×	85 1.8×	91 1.9×	21	332
Kate Williams Australia	6	120 1.0×	158 2.5×	16 0.3×	42 0.9×	156 3.3×	30	387
Kathryn E. W. Himmelstein United States	6	129 1.1×	48 0.8×	58 1.2×	102 2.1×	27 0.6×	11	321
Melanie Jansen Australia	10	148 1.2×	158 2.5×	48 1.0×	53 1.1×	229 4.8×	24	511
Patricia Lenahan United States	8	130 1.1×	49 0.8×	79 1.6×	80 1.7×	55 1.1×	16	360

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Campbell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Campbell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Campbell. The network helps show where Jane Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Campbell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Campbell. Jane Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

McIsaac, Michelle, et al.. (2019). Gender equity in the health workforce: analysis of 104 countries. 256 indexed citations breakdown →

2.

Campbell, Jane, et al.. (2017). Supporting Patient Outcomes through Organised Networks (SPOT ON). International Journal of Integrated Care. 17(5). 309–309. 1 indexed citations

3.

Campbell, Jane, et al.. (2011). Nurse fatigue: an NCNA survey.. PubMed. 73(3). 12–5. 4 indexed citations

4.

Palmer, Mary H., et al.. (2008). Using clinical simulations in geriatric nursing continuing education. Nursing Outlook. 56(4). 159–166. 14 indexed citations

5.

Mylvaganam, Senthurun, et al.. (2008). The ENT emergency clinic: a prospective audit to improve effectiveness of an established service. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 123(2). 229–233. 13 indexed citations

6.

Campbell, Jane. (2008). Health Literacy in Primary Care: A Clinician's Guide. Nursing Education Perspectives. 29(2). 114–114. 20 indexed citations

7.

Bellamy, N., et al.. (2000). A Canadian survey on the management of corticosteroid induced osteoporosis by rheumatologists.. PubMed. 27(6). 1506–12. 24 indexed citations

8.

Campbell, Jane, et al.. (1991). Hearing aid prescribing: Is the specialist opinion necessary?. Clinical Otolaryngology. 16(2). 124–127. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact