Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems
2006813 citationsThomas G. Whitham, Joseph K. Bailey et al.profile →
Life history strategies among soil bacteria—dichotomy for few, continuum for many
202394 citationsBram WG Stone, Paul Dijkstra et al.The ISME Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane C. Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane C. Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane C. Marks more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane C. Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane C. Marks. The network helps show where Jane C. Marks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane C. Marks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane C. Marks.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane C. Marks based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jane C. Marks. Jane C. Marks is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stone, Bram WG, Paul Dijkstra, Brianna Finley, et al.. (2023). Life history strategies among soil bacteria—dichotomy for few, continuum for many. The ISME Journal. 17(4). 611–619.94 indexed citations breakdown →
Sklar, L. S., et al.. (2008). Feedbacks between biotic and abiotic influences on travertine deposition, Fossil Creek, Arizona.. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2008.1 indexed citations
15.
Cohen, Adam E., Dean A. Hendrickson, Camille Parmesan, & Jane C. Marks. (2005). Habitat segregation among trophic morphs of the Cuatro Ciénegas cichlid (Herichthys minckleyi). Hidrobiológica. 15(2). 169–181.8 indexed citations
16.
Whitham, Thomas G., Eric V. Lonsdorf, Jennifer A. Schweitzer, et al.. (2005). "All effects of a gene on the world": Extended phenotypes, feedbacks, and multi-level selection. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).7 indexed citations
17.
Cohen, Adam E., Dean A. Hendrickson, Camille Parmesan, & Jane C. Marks. (2005). Habitat Segregation among Trophic Morphs of the Cuatro Ciénegas Cichlid (Herichthys minckleyi) Segregación de hábitat entre formas tróficas de la mojarra de Cuatro Ciénegas ( Herichthys minckleyi).
Marks, Jane C.. (1980). The benzodiazepines--use and abuse.. PubMed. 30(5a). 898–901.10 indexed citations
20.
Laarman, J. J., et al.. (1979). Studies on frenkeliosis and frenkelia induced coccidiosis in the netherlands. 31(1). 167–168.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.