Jane Bridges

543 total citations
8 papers, 417 citations indexed

About

Jane Bridges is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Bridges has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 417 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 3 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Jane Bridges's work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers) and MRI in cancer diagnosis (1 paper). Jane Bridges is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers) and MRI in cancer diagnosis (1 paper). Jane Bridges collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Jane Bridges's co-authors include J.G. Grudzinskas, Colin D. Reynolds, Ian Jacobs, Isabel Stabile, Thomas Ind, Maria A. Schmidt, Geoffrey S. Payne, Veronica A. Morgan, Nandita M. deSouza and Sharon Giles and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Analytica Chimica Acta.

In The Last Decade

Jane Bridges

8 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jane Bridges United Kingdom	6	214	158	101	93	84	8	417
Claes Tropé Norway	10	307 1.4×	197 1.2×	76 0.8×	53 0.6×	65 0.8×	13	443
Lucía González‐Cortijo Spain	11	179 0.8×	192 1.2×	108 1.1×	34 0.4×	84 1.0×	26	434
Masato Miyama Japan	13	241 1.1×	227 1.4×	42 0.4×	76 0.8×	78 0.9×	26	466
Androutsopoulos Georgios Greece	11	163 0.8×	238 1.5×	146 1.4×	29 0.3×	41 0.5×	93	462
Krishnayan Haldar United Kingdom	11	280 1.3×	197 1.2×	105 1.0×	28 0.3×	57 0.7×	24	529
Valérie Dubé Canada	13	236 1.1×	289 1.8×	85 0.8×	31 0.3×	49 0.6×	30	576
Melina Shoni United States	12	189 0.9×	224 1.4×	124 1.2×	30 0.3×	155 1.8×	23	619
U. Metzger France	14	267 1.2×	227 1.4×	76 0.8×	35 0.4×	76 0.9×	46	658
Brunella Pasinetti Italy	11	239 1.1×	217 1.4×	119 1.2×	25 0.3×	23 0.3×	15	455
Melissa M. Thrall United States	11	451 2.1×	221 1.4×	144 1.4×	49 0.5×	55 0.7×	13	599

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Bridges

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Bridges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Bridges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Bridges more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Bridges

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Bridges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Bridges. The network helps show where Jane Bridges may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Bridges

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Bridges. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Bridges based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Bridges. Jane Bridges is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Ind, Thomas, Chris Marshall, Matthew Hacking, et al.. (2015). Introducing robotic surgery into an endometrial cancer service–a prospective evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in a UK institution. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 12(1). 137–144. 21 indexed citations

Nobbenhuis, Marielle, Elizabeth Bancroft, Eleanor Moskovic, et al.. (2011). Screening for ovarian cancer in women with varying levels of risk, using annual tests, results in high recall for repeat screening tests. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice. 9(1). 11–11. 5 indexed citations

Payne, Geoffrey S., Maria A. Schmidt, Veronica A. Morgan, et al.. (2009). Evaluation of magnetic resonance diffusion and spectroscopy measurements as predictive biomarkers in stage 1 cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 116(2). 246–252. 88 indexed citations

Dee, Cheryl R., et al.. (2007). Experience and Outcomes of Medical Librarian Rounding. Medical Reference Services Quarterly. 26(4). 85–92. 11 indexed citations

Larkin, James, Mohammad Badran, Roger A’Hern, et al.. (2002). Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Metastasizing to the Brain: A Late Manifestation of the Disease With an Increasing Incidence. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 20(4). 982–986. 92 indexed citations

Burns, D. Thorburn, Robert Lewis, & Jane Bridges. (1998). Systematic approach to the identification of water-gel explosives. Analytica Chimica Acta. 375(3). 255–260. 8 indexed citations

Jacobs, Ian, et al.. (1988). MULTIMODAL APPROACH TO SCREENING FOR OVARIAN CANCER. The Lancet. 331(8580). 268–271. 189 indexed citations

Oram, David & Jane Bridges. (1987). 9 Para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Baillière s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1(2). 369–381. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact